The Guardian
Email YouTube Facebook Instagram Twitter

Sexual harassment on campuses may attract five-year jail term

Related

PHOTO: thewilsonbeacon.com

PHOTO: thewilsonbeacon.com

Heads of institutions to be liable too

As part of measures to prohibit sexual harassment of students in institutions of higher learning, and bring to an end, a major distraction to academic pursuit on campuses, a bill has been formulated and presented before the Senate.

The bill proposes a compulsory five-year jail term for any lecturer who sexually harasses a student, while heads of institutions of learning, where such activities take place would be held liable too.

By the proposed law, vice chancellors of universities, rectors of polytechnics and chief executives of sundry institutions would go to jail for two years for failing to act within a week of complaints of sexual harassments.

The bill introduced by the senator representing Delta Central Ovie Omo-Agege, has received support of many senators, who have also confirmed their co-sponsorship of the bill.
They include senators Ben Murray-Bruce (Bayelsa East), Princess Stella Odua/ Anambra North; Rose Oko, Cross River North, and Fatima Raji Rasaki, Ekiti Central.

Also co-sponsoring the bill are Senators Oluremi Tinubu, Lagos Central; Ibrahim Gobir, Sokoto East; Bunmi Olujimi, Ekiti South; Munsorat Sunmonu, Oyo Central; Ahmed Ogembe, Kogi Central and Binta Masi Garba, Adamawa North.

Omo-Agege, the only senator elected on the platform of Labour Party, explained that involving his colleagues as co-sponsors underscores the gravity of the problem and the urgent attention needed to tackle it.

“We need to protect our students, particularly our daughters, from sexual perverts who use unethical and coercive means to instill fear in them and compel acquiescence sexual liaisons,” he stated.

The senator disclosed that the bill was a product of research commissioned on the issue, stressing that it has become imperative to restore faith and decency to the country’s learning environment.

His words: “No parent wants his or her child to learn under the trauma of sexual harassment. Unless you are married to a student, stay away from our students. If not, be ready for jail if your intentions are sexually perverse.”

The bill allows sexually harassed students, their parents, and guardians to seek civil remedies in damages against the sexual predator/lecturers before or after their successful criminal prosecution by the state.

Besides, the bill seeks protection from sexual harassment for prospective students seeking admissions into higher educational institutions.

The bill, which is generating interests in the academic communities, and among non-governmental organisations (NGOs), is said to have also caught the attention of the Office of the First Lady, and the Ministry of Women Affairs and Social Development, have indicated interest and believed to be exploring how best to support the bill.



3 Comments
  • Egbokodo andrew jolomi

    There is also high level of corruption in the higher institutions which also needs attention. Most of us that pass through the system knows our students are very lazy now they no longer ted because they believe in blocking.Since this administration is poise to fight corruption the crusade should also be extended to higher institutions.

  • Kingsley

    i consider this a distraction & idling away of the senate! what happens to PIB? it has stayed long on the queue of NASS

  • amador kester

    There is the problem of the burden of proof ,in as much as checking this vice is a nice idea. But how do you prove these things beyond reasonable doubt? How do you equally avoid a clever trap of blackmail and set up? Only biochemical laboratory analysis or ” red handed multiple witness indictment” can perhaps attempt evidential proof to a reasonable extent. A law however can also be deterrent even if it is not objectively implementable technically.But a bill factoring in grade selling and handouts extortions is easier to garner prosecutorial evidence if litigated actionably. Money could be marked or the currency numbers coded, and simple book keeping can track handouts or book sales extortions
    .And there is the fundamental ambuiguity of what fully constitutes this sexual offence in all its ramifications eg does a kiss etc constitute a sexual offence? Thorough research is needed here and of course technicality and values must elevate commonsense in their diammetrical ,antipodal approaches to the problem paradigm. Whats worth doing is worth doing well