Why does it matter who enters exam hall first?
There are indeed some actions that take place within the political horizons of Nigeria that are so difficult to accurately appreciate from the positive point of view whilst other tendencies that spring up amongst Nigerian politicians beggars belief.
There are certain operational styles that politicians use that are so complex for the majority of observers to interprete with reasonable accuracy.
One of such intriguing developments is the ongoing debate on the recently amended Electoral Act with specific reference to the changes that were effected on the sequence of elections in the next electoral calendar in the year 2019.
The focus of the debate is not even on whether the legislators have the power to so reorder the sequence of elections but the emphasis has shifted to the mundane matter of what impacts the decision could have in determining the sets of outcomes of the initial stages of the electoral processes.
This confirms the apprehension amongst some observers that Nigeria is seriously bereft of statesmen but that what we have are politicians whose only focus is on winning the next election.
The independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has even stepped into the fray by stating that it can only work with the sequence of election only if the amendments are signed into law by President Muhammadu Buhari.
INEC had hitherto hinted that it may use legal application in the Courts of law to seek the demolition of that extensive scale of change to the sequence of election.
INEC must be reminded that it is not their duty to pick and choose when to implement any amendments made to relevant laws that relates to the election calendar so long as the process of such legislative amendments meets the best global practices and follows the legal precepts clearly enunciated by extant provisions of the law.
The position as voiced out by the INEC’s Chairman that it will only comply with the changes to the sequence of election only if the amendments are signed into law by the President is to put it mildly, grossly irrational and irresponsible.
This position of the chairman of INEC is a red herring since the National Assembly may decide to wield its veto power to override the decision of the President not to endorse the amendments put forward by it.
The Electoral commission must avoid dabbling into matters that could undermine the confidence and trust that Nigerians are expected to have on INEC.
The moment the credibility of INEC comes into grave doubts then the integrity of the Election is already compromised and jeopardised.
The bone of contention should indeed be around the question of the steps taken by the legislators to reach such a determination.
Does the National Assembly have the constitutional powers to so determine how elections are held in line with the provisions of the Electoral Act? Surely, he who has the power to make the Electoral Act surely has the powers to revisit or amend any relevant aspects of such laws it created ab initio.
The National Assembly is no doubt empowered to improve extant laws and legislations for the overall benefit of the democratisation processes.
The National Assembly’s most fundamental duty is the power to make or alter provisions of extant laws and statutes governing the wellbeing of Nigerians.
So the two chambers of the National Assembly then decided in their considered wisdom to effect far reaching changes to the Electoral Act and made the specific change that brings forward the Presidential election to take place first before other elections.
Since this innocuous change was made, the political environment of Nigeria has become charged even as there is an ongoing perception being planted that these steps taken to change the sequence of election was targeted at the President who has through the Secretary to the Government of the Federation indicated his readiness to run for a second term come next year. This conclusion isn’t just illogical but laughable.
Try as I can to understand why it matters which election comes first and why the supporters of the incumbent President are selling this unproductive and imbecilic dummy that the reordering of the sequence of the Election calendar was targeted at the President, my fertile imagination finds it unable to articulate and understand this strange mode of reasoning.
This is preposterous. Understandably, a Senator from Plateau state accused the so called pro- Buhari Senators of collecting bribes to cause commotion. This is perhaps the only best way to analyse the underlying reason behind the clamour by some of these fringe thinkers that the re sequencing of the election dates was made to undermine the success of the APC’s Presidential candidate.
How on Earth will some members of the Red Chamber stage a walk-out in protest against the adoption of the report by the Senate and House of Representatives Joint Committee on the Amendment to the Electoral Act?
According to the protesting Senator’s, despite the adoption of the report by the Senate, they would insist on its reversal. Why do you think you want to achieve by reversing through unconstitutional means the amendments that followed due process? Senator Useni of Plateau State couldn’t be more pungent when he stated that the alterations are already a concluded and democratically decided making it impossible to overturn.
The protesting lawmakers also made a very wild and unsubstantiated allegation that the amendment was targeted at Buhari are indeed carrying this joke very far.
Onwubiko is the head of the Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA).
No comments yet