New ideas are unacceptable, I know. There is, however, a contradiction between the thief-in-the-night coming (as quoted above), on the one hand, and the globally-public, highly illuminated, trumpeted coming, on the other hand, when even those, long dead, who pierced him, will see him.

The thief-in-the-night metaphor, which Jesus used, is a coming back to earth but in darkness and in secrecy (since no thief blows a trumpet, shouts loudly and switches on all the lights). Some people do not get to see Jesus on this return, for five of the ten virgins were shut out after the Bridegroom had arrived. They did not go into what was a secret meeting for a few or, at least, not for everyone.

I now understand the New Testament as revealing a private coming in the form of visits, such that Jesus moves from one place to another as quickly as lightning, so that there is no point someone saying that “he’s there or here or in the desert or in a house”. News reporters would always get there too late since he would have already moved on to his next visit.
His public coming will be different in that it will not consist of multiple appearances, but just one. In that one appearance, everyone on earth will stop what they are doing and stare at the gloriously light-filled coming of the Son of God in the sky.

Jesus once said, “You will not see me again until you say: Blessed is he who comes with the Name of the Lord”. This statement fits better with the private, multiple visiting return of Christ because it appears to allow for some people not to recognise the Person coming with the Name of the Lord – they therefore continue to be unblessed on account of not recognising him.

The private, visiting return of Christ will be the time when the servants who have increased the talents given to them are congratulated. It is also the time when those, who stated that they did not want him to reign over them, are brought into his presence at his command and killed in front of him.

If those, who refused to have him reign over him when he was last on the earth, are Jews, then the killing of these people will fit with Jesus’ statement that, when we see Jerusalem surrounded by militant groups (which is the present situation), then know that its utter destruction is about to occur. Jesus stated that Jerusalem would be destroyed together with her children in her.

Daniel tells us that seventy years is given to the destructions (note more than one destruction) of Jerusalem. Well, the first destruction occurred miraculously in 70CE although the Roman army had been about to attack the city in 68CE but didn’t because Nero died that year.

The next stand-alone seventy years is, as far as I can see, the year we are in now – that is, the seventy years from the passing of the resolution by the UN on 28 November 1947 that Jerusalem and Israel were to be built again and the Jews were to be allowed to return to accomplish this.

Maybe the private multiple visits of Jesus will begin to occur in this seventieth year, in order to end the old covenant of Judaism, and to usher in a new era of the New Covenant of the New Testament – without the Judaism of the old covenant being present on the earth anymore.