The Federal High Court in Abuja on Tuesday dismissed a suit filed to challenge the removal of Justice Danladi Yakubu Umar as Chairman of the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT), following a formal notice of withdrawal by the plaintiffs.

The plaintiffs, Community Rescue Initiative, Toro Concerned Citizens of a Relief Foundation, and Abuja-based lawyer, Comrade Nasir Bala, had jointly instituted the suit against President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), Senate President Godswill Akpabio, and six others.

The Senate had in November asked President Bola Tinubu to remove Danladi Umar as CCT chairman due to allegations of corruption and misconduct.

The upper chamber adopted its resolution during the plenary after Senate President Godswill Akpabio put it to a vote, and a majority of the senators supported it.

The resolution was taken following the provisions of Section 157 (1) of the Nigerian Constitution, which stipulates that two-thirds of the membership of the Senate can advise the president to remove the CCT chair.

The Senate subsequently approved the resolution.

Before that time, even before the removal of Danladi by the senate, President Tinubu in July 2024 had approved the appointment of Dr. Mainasara Umar Kogo as CCT chairman.

In the suit by the plaintiffs, they sought to restrain the Clerk of the National Assembly from transmitting the resolutions of the Senate and House of Representatives to the President, as well as halt any attempt by the Executive to act on the resolution purportedly removing Justice Umar from office.

The plaintiffs contended that the National Assembly acted in breach of constitutional provisions, particularly Sections 157(1) and 22(3) of the Code of Conduct Bureau and Tribunal Act, as well as relevant paragraphs of the 1999 Constitution, in recommending Umar’s removal.

But at the resumed hearing of the matter on Tuesday, counsel to the plaintiffs informed the court, presided over by Justice James Omotosho, of their decision to discontinue the matter.

A formal notice of withdrawal had already been filed and brought to the court’s attention.

Justice Omotosho consequently dismissed the case.