Human rights lawyer, Deji Adeyanju, has called on the National Assembly to repeal Section 21 of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Act, 2007, which criminalises various forms of “abuse” of the naira, including the widely-practised cultural tradition of money spraying at social events.

In an open letter released on Friday, Adeyanju argued that the controversial provision is out of touch with Nigeria’s cultural values and disproportionately targets everyday citizens engaging in celebratory acts rooted in history and tradition.

He noted that the spraying of money has long been a cherished cultural practice in Nigeria.

Adeyanju acknowledged the importance of protecting the naira’s integrity but insisted that the rigid application of the law fails to distinguish between willful destruction and cultural expression.

He noted that sprayed notes are often preserved and returned to circulation, unlike mutilated currency that is intentionally destroyed.

He said, “When there is a gap between what the law dictates and how the people live, tension is inevitable. And when that gap widens, the law begins to feel distant, less like a source of order, and more like a burden.

“The spraying of money has long been a cherished cultural practice in Nigeria that is deep-rooted in the social fabric of celebrations such as weddings, birthdays, funerals, chieftaincy ceremonies, etc. It is an act that expresses joy, generosity, and goodwill.

“For many communities, spraying money is not merely a display of wealth but a performative language of affection and cultural significance.

“However, the recent stance by law enforcement agencies against what is defined as the “mutilation” or “abuse” of the naira in line with the provision of Section 21, Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Act, 2007, has resulted in the prosecution of prominent figures for acts seemingly innocuous as spraying money at events.

“Section 21 of the CBN Act criminalises tampering with the naira, which includes spraying, writing on, stapling, or otherwise defacing notes. The intention behind this legislation, presumably, is to preserve the integrity and longevity of the national currency.

“But while the protection of the naira is a valid objective, the enforcement of this law reveals troubling inconsistencies and raises serious questions about cultural context, proportionality in punishment, and the selective targeting of individuals. What the law characterises as abuse is, for millions of Nigerians, a legitimate form of celebration. In practice, sprayed notes are not necessarily damaged or rendered unusable.

“They are often collected, preserved, and reintroduced into circulation. Yet, this nuance is lost in the rigid application of Section 21, which draws no meaningful distinction between deliberate mutilation and cultural expression.

“The real irony lies not just in how the law is enforced, but in where the greatest abuse of the naira actually occurs. It is not at weddings or on red carpets, but in everyday places like markets, churches, and mosques, where people engage directly with the currency to trade, give offerings, or make donations.

“Even the most respected currencies in the world (dollars, pounds, and euros) suffer the same fate in the hands of ordinary people conducting daily transactions. To criminalise ordinary cultural or commercial engagement with money is to misunderstand the nature of currency itself.

“Does gently placing a note on someone’s forehead count as tampering with the naira? In seeking to protect the naira, the law appears to be devaluing the rich cultural symbolism that gives money meaning beyond its economic function. We must not let the enforcement of the law become an instrument that erodes our traditions and way of life.

“Any law that targets the way of life of the people is not a good law. Such a law is out of touch and out of place with the cultural heartbeat of the nation it seeks to govern. The law must serve the people, not the other way around.”