Thursday, 25th April 2024
To guardian.ng
Search

Battle over cybercrimes goes to Supreme Court

By Ugo Onwuaso
03 August 2018   |   3:08 am
The legal battle over the constitutionality of sections of the Cybercrimes Act 2015 has now moved to the Supreme Court. Three civil society organisations, namely Media Rights Agenda, Paradigm Initiative and Enough Is Enough Nigeria are pleading with apex court to expunge Sections 24 and 38 of the Cybercrimes Act 2015. The organisations filed a…

Federal high court, Abuja

The legal battle over the constitutionality of sections of the Cybercrimes Act 2015 has now moved to the Supreme Court.

Three civil society organisations, namely Media Rights Agenda, Paradigm Initiative and Enough Is Enough Nigeria are pleading with apex court to expunge Sections 24 and 38 of the Cybercrimes Act 2015.

The organisations filed a notice of appeal with the Supreme Court on July 31, 2018.

The organizations commenced this journey in May 2016, when, their lawyer Olumide Babalola first filed an action for judicial review of the aforementioned sections of the Act at the Federal High Court sitting in Abuja.

On January 20, 2017, the court, however, ruled that the sections were constitutional.

The unfavourable decision at the High Court pushed the organisations to approach the Court of Appeal.

The appeal with case number A/L/556/2017 was however decided against the appellants, in a judgement delivered on June 22, 2018.

The organisations are now putting their hope in the Supreme Court to ensure Sections 24 and 38 of the Cybercrimes Act 2015 are stricken off the Nigerian law book.

According to Tope Ogundipe, Paradigm Initiative’s Director of Programs, “It bears repeating here that Section 24 of the Cybercrimes Act is about Cyberstalking and that section has been repeatedly used to harass and persecute journalists and critics.

“It’s arguably the most dangerous provision against freedom of speech, opinion and inquiry.

0 Comments