Thursday, 25th April 2024
To guardian.ng
Search

Stakeholders Decry Low Capacity Utilization of Bandwidth

By Chike Onwuegbuchi
16 October 2015   |   4:14 am
IN spite of huge bandwidth capacity brought into the country by the various undersea cable infrastructure providers, a paltry 10 percent of the capacity is been demanded by subscribers of the commodity and stakeholders are worried.

INTERNETIN spite of huge bandwidth capacity brought into the country by the various undersea cable infrastructure providers, a paltry 10 percent of the capacity is been demanded by subscribers of the commodity and stakeholders are worried.
Nigeria CommunicationsWeek investigations revealed that the entire capacity undersea cable infrastructure brought into the country stood at 8.0 terabyte per second bandwidth.

A breakdown of which showed Glo with 1 2.5Tb/s; Mainone 1.28Tb/s; WACS 3.84Tb/s; and SAT-3 340Gbit/s.

Out of these avalanche of bandwidth, only about 10 per cent are in demand, leaving the rest idle.

Engr. Lanre Ajayi, president, Association of Telecommunications Companies of Nigeria (ATCON), said that “we are using less than 10 percent of capacity of the bandwidth that lands at our shores. Investors in the undersea cables are lamenting over low level of capacity utilization”.

Nodding in agreement, Kazeem Oladepo, general counsel, MainOne Cable, said: “Today in Nigeria, we see latent demand rise slowly but steadily. Currently, I doubt if there is any operator in Nigeria exhausting up to 10 percent of the capacity they have on their submarine cable, meaning that the investment is at least 90 percent underutilized, a constraint, of course, on their ability to generate revenue to recover not only its cost; but also earn margin on the investment.”

“When compared with developed markets such as the United Kingdom, operators that are largely tier I operators these include, AT&T, TATA, Interoute, PCCW, among others, their wholesale prices in Europe are far lower as these operators do not have the constraints that are peculiar to our market. The transmission cost of moving traffic from location to location is almost nothing, since you do not need to move the capacity 7,000 kilometers away from the tele-house,” he noted.

He explained that the biggest issue is infrastructure to support the delivery of the services in reality, ‘availability of this infrastructure and the price of access to it, are still not competitive. Connecting a customer in Abuja remains far more expensive than the cost of connecting Lagos to London as we have maintained and this will remain so until we have the appropriate regime to force anti-competitive pricing of terrestrial infrastructure down and compel open access to the infrastructure”.

David Venn, chief executive officer, Spectranet, a 4G LTE internet service provider, identified factors responsible for low bandwidth capacity utilization.

0 Comments