The UK government acted unlawfully by changing legislation to give police tougher powers to clamp down on street protests, judges ruled on Tuesday.
Civil liberties group Liberty brought a legal challenge to the amendments, which campaigners said gave police “almost unlimited” powers to restrict protests.
The changes were pushed through when Suella Braverman was home secretary. She had repeatedly promised to crack down on protesters using so-called “guerilla tactics”.
That followed action, particularly by environmental groups such as Just Stop Oil and Extinction Rebellion, in which protesters glued or attached themselves to roads and buildings.
Liberty’s challenge centred on powers conferred by parliament to the home secretary to amend existing laws about when police could intervene during protests to prevent “serious” wider disruption.
Two judges ruled that lawmakers had not intended to lower the threshold for police action against protesters. The home office allowed police to target anything considered a “more than minor” disturbance.
The government only consulted law enforcement agencies before enacting the changes, the High Court ruling added.
“For the procedure to be fair and balanced, government needed at least to obtain the views of those who might be adversely affected by the proposed measures,” the judges added.
Liberty called the judgment “a victory for democracy” and said it “sets down an important marker that the government cannot just do what it wants”.
Braverman, a right winger who was sacked for outspoken comments on immigration, initially tried to give police greater powers via a parliamentary vote on a new public order act.
Lawmakers rejected those proposals. But a few months later she used secondary legislation, which allows a minister to amend an existing law, to secure the powers “through the back door”, Liberty said.
The government has indicated that it will appeal the ruling.
