Trial continued, yesterday, in the charge marked FHC/ABJ/CR/550/2022: FRN V. Ali Bello & Anor, before Justice J. K Omotosho at the Federal High Court, Abuja Division.
The 1st and 2nd defendants’ counsel, A.M Aliyu, and Nureini Jimoh, respectively, cross-examined the prosecution’s 2nd witness, Edward Bananda, from the United Bank for Africa (UBA) with respect to the evidence he tendered (statements of accounts).
The witness, upon examination of the entire bank statements he produced at trial, stated that he could not remember seeing the names of Ali Bello and Dauda Suleiman as beneficiaries, who made withdrawals from the account tendered.
He, however, confirmed that one Abdulsalam Hudu made most of the withdrawals from the account statements.
The witness also stated that he played no role in the entries contained in the statements of account, and only became a witness in the matter due to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission’s (EFCC) invitation.
Bananda also confirmed that the cash transactions of the Kogi State Government and the state Government House Administration, as seen in the statements of account, did not contravene the Cash Withdrawal Policy of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), the bank or any law.
The attempt by Rotimi Oyedepo to re-examine the witness on the issue of the absence of Bello and Suleiman’s on the statements of account and the operation of a computer was overruled.
