Malabu case: EFCC dismisses compromise allegation, considers appeal

EFCC

Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has dismissed the allegation that one of its prosecutors was offered a bribe over the Malabu OPL 245 fraud case, which led to the dismissal of the charges against the former Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Bello Adoke (SAN) and others by a Federal Capital Territory High Court. 
 
It described the allegation as false. The anti-corruption agency disclosed that it had commenced a review of developments around the Malabu OPL 245 fraud case, including the dismissal of the charges against Adoke and others by the Court in Abuja.
 
The review, it said, would entail an exploration of the option of appeal and possible change of counsel because of the Commission’s dissatisfaction with the handling of the case by Offem Uket.
 
Speaking on the alleged bribing of its official, the EFCC said its intention to review or appeal the case “has no nexus whatsoever to the spew of speculations imputing compromise by parties to the charge, currently making the rounds in some sections of the media.”
 
After the decision of the Abuja High Court upholding the no-case submission of the defendants in the criminal case, a certain online news outfit had spewed the narrative suggesting that the EFCC accused its prosecutor of compromise through a prominent Nigerian lawyer, who stood in for one of the defendants in the case.
 
In denying the narrative of compromise, the anti-corruption agency said: “The EFCC is not obliged to embrace such narratives as it neither accused any of the parties of any unsavoury conduct nor made any conclusive statements about any investigation on the matter.”
 
The agency also dubbed allegations of compromise as “effusions of mischief makers” and urged the general public to await its next course of action. The clarification by the anti-crime agency was made by a statement posted on its website and on its social media handles.

Author

Don't Miss