The Nigerian Shipping and Port Economic Regulatory Agency Bill 2023 currently before the House of Representatives may suffer the failure of previous versions due to its disjointed articulation and pursuance of personal interest, advocacy groups have warned.

According to the Nigerian Maritime Renaissance Network (NMRN), the bill, which has passed a second reading in the lower chamber, is filled with ambiguities that can only precipitate confusion and duplications in the functions of the maritime regulatory agencies.

A statement by the Lagos-based organisation said numerous areas of the bill lack the clarity that is essential in addressing its core purpose and adding value to port operations.

President of the group, Temple Isomah, said the group watched with discomfort as the one-day hearing by the House of Representatives Committee on Shipping Services and Related Matters deviated from the roadmap of the presidential policy on reduction of the cost of governance and unveiled overload the new agency emerging from the Bill with functions of other agencies.

“The first fallout of the bill is the evolution of a mega-agency which will be enmeshed in agency capture given the powers given to it to oversee the operations of other agencies in the sector. This situation will engender dirty competition and politicking that will undermine the growth of the industry.

“In its present form, the bill will produce a port economic regulator that would be more powerful than even the Federal Ministry of Marine and Blue Economy in the same way that we have a state oil company that is richer and stronger than its supervising ministry and industry regulator. This should be avoided,” the group said in a statement.

The bill, the group said, should strike a delicate balance between reforms and creating a level playing field that ensures competitiveness that will unlock substantial opportunities for the country.

According to NMRN, the way forward is to explore further dialogue among the agencies in the industry in an unhindered atmosphere to provide clearer guidance on the appropriate articulation of their roles which would be embedded in the bill before its passage by the national assembly.

The speed with which sponsors of the bill are pushing for passage suggests a quest by some individuals and groups to put their interests ahead of that of the country, it added.

Similarly, President of the National Council of Managing Director of Licensed Customs Agents (NCMDLCA), Lucky Amiwero, said the bill would fuel conflict and create obstacles to implementation, adding that existing legislation should not be duplicated or overridden by the provision.

“The bill contains clauses that conflict with other agencies, especially NPA 42-(a) usurping the powers of Licensing of port Service and facilities, is that of the landlord, who is the owner of the land, who lease the land that is Nigerian Port Authority and partial owner of the leased/concession facilities.

“Usurping powers and conflict will create obstacles to implementation, existing legislation should not be duplicated or overridden by provision. Under Clause 70 contains the interpretation of various terms prescribed service, means a person, body or agency which is prescribed by this bill as such or providing prescribed service in Nigeria within the meaning of Section 38 of this bill and includes Nigerian Railways Corporation, Nigerian Ports Authority, National Inland Waterways Authority and other agencies providing regulated service of any nature in the regulated sector in Nigeria”, he added.