The Guardian
Email YouTube Facebook Instagram Twitter WhatsApp

Jury sentences Boston bomber Tsarnaev to death


A US jury on Friday unanimously sentenced Boston bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev to death for perpetrating one of the bloodiest assaults in America since the September 11, 2001 attacks.

It took the jury more than 14 hours to choose death on six of the 17 capital counts over life imprisonment for the 21-year-old Muslim former university student of Chechen descent who came to the United States as a child.

The same 12-member panel convicted him on April 8 on all 30 counts relating to the April 15, 2013 bombings, the murder of a police officer, a car jacking and a shootout while on the run.

Three people were killed and 264 others wounded, including 17 who lost limbs, in the twin blasts near the finish line at the northeastern city’s popular marathon.

Tsarnaev went on the run and was arrested four days later, hiding and injured in a grounded boat on which he had scrawled a bloody message apparently defending the attacks as a means to avenge the US wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Two years later, he stood in a dark blazer with his hands clasped before him, showing no emotion as the court clerk read from the death penalty.

The court was silent during the verdict reading.

Government prosecutors called Tsarnaev a remorseless terrorist who deserves to die for inflicting carnage. The defense said he was a “lost kid,” manipulated into the “heinous crime” by his radical older brother.

– Death penalty opposition –

Prominent survivors had opposed the death penalty for Tsarnaev, a teenager at the time, fearing that lengthy appeals would dredge up their agony.

The federal sentence comes despite widespread opposition to the death penalty in the state of Massachusetts, where no one has been executed since 1947.

Survivors, including the parents of the youngest victim eight-year-old Martin Richard, crammed into the gallery to hear the verdict.

Since the federal death penalty was reinstated in 1988, only 79 people have been sentenced to die and only three have been executed, says the Death Penalty Information Center.

Three other death verdicts were turned into life sentences after new trials were granted.

The decision caps a harrowing, more than two-month trial that saw the court relive the horror of the attacks day after day through grisly videos and heartbreaking testimony from those who lost limbs and loved ones.

Receive News Alerts on Whatsapp: +2348136370421

  • Pelumi Osunrayi

    I believe this bomber should be sentenced to death. He is
    responsible for killing 3 people and wounding 264 people which includes people
    who lost limbs. This is too much. Killing one person is enough reason for him
    to be killed too, let alone doing all these. A man who takes another man’s life
    doesn’t deserve to have his own (except for executioners of course). I hope this
    bomber gets killed.

    This news story was posted on this site at 8:46pm. I saw it
    in the column of latest news. This is one main advantage of online journalism,
    immediacy. The Internet is the fastest
    in terms of being the source of information compared to the traditional
    ways of obtaining information. In just a
    few moment, you already know what is happening unlike in mainstream media that
    you have to wait for the information to be given to you and it may take an hour
    or a day (in newspapers) before you obtain the information.

    However, the benefit of immediacy can give rise to some
    serious ethical issues. The desire to publish brand new information and the
    ease of which it can be altered causes information to be made accessible before
    it is verified. This undermines the journalistic principle of accuracy and can
    lead to misinformation because there is a great possibility that these news
    stories didn’t go through an editor before they were posted. Accuracy is compromised for speed.

    I personally prefer
    news with verified facts and a little bit late than others than news made with
    haste but have no context and have unverified facts because misinformation has
    great consequences attached to it and a lot of damage could have been done
    before the news is corrected. So I advice media houses to verify their news
    stories properly before publishing them.



  • Hyginus Nnadi

    That’s justice well deserved, the souls of the victims of the bomber’s evil act will be pleased to welcome him to the great beyond, unfortunately, in my own country Nigeria, hundres of the arrested Boko haram members, not even one has been convicted, this is a nation where everything including justice, equity and fairness are considered on the basis of ethnicity and religion.