Wednesday, 24th April 2024
To guardian.ng
Search
News  

Wolves defends team selection against United

By Babs Odukoya
24 December 2009   |   8:15 am
WOLVES says it is baffled as to why the club has been asked to justify Mick McCarthy's team selection in the match against Manchester United last week. Coach McCarthy rested 10 first-team players in the defeat at Old Trafford to keep them fresh for Sunday's Burnley match. League rules state that a full-strength side must be played in all top-flight games. "We expressed surprise as to why we're being asked for an explanation given there are examples of teams doing the same," chief executive Jez Moxey said. "In the letter, we contest any accusation that we didn't field a full-strength team at Old Trafford."

Wolves lost the game 0-3 but went on to beat relegation rival, Burnley, 2-0 on Sunday, seemingly justifying McCarthy’s decision. Moxey continued: “We’re confident of our position on this and have cited the example of three or four other teams doing something similar.

“If we’d fielded five youngsters then I could understand the risk of us being in bother. But I think with the exception of George Fried, it was the same 20-man squad that travelled to Tottenham.”

Wolves beat Tottenham 1-0 days before its visit to Old Trafford, with McCarthy also citing the nature of the victory over Spurs as another reason to rest key players. That victory over Spurs was the second successive top-flight win for Wolves – the first time the club had achieved that in 26 years.

But McCarthy responded to the victories by keeping faith only with goalkeeper Marcus Hahnemann against United, explaining afterwards that the physical exertions of the players at White Hart Lane ensured that they needed a rest. The second string went on to lose comfortably, leaving many fans bemused and frustrated.

McCarthy’s selection against United was branded “grossly disrespectful” by Wolves’ supporter chief, Arthur Williams. And several of the 3,000 Wolves supporters that travelled to Manchester also asked for their money back.

0 Comments