Saturday, 1st March 2025
To guardian.ng
Search

African Alliance seeks redress against NAICOM’s action

By Joseph Onyekwere 
11 November 2024   |   2:19 am
African Alliance Insurance Plc has asked the Federal High Court, Lagos to nullify the dissolution of its board by the National Insurance Commission (NAICOM). In a suit marked FHC/L/CS/ 2008/2024, it is praying for a declaration
African Alliance Insurance Plc

African Alliance Insurance Plc has asked the Federal High Court, Lagos to nullify the dissolution of its board by the National Insurance Commission (NAICOM).
In a suit marked FHC/L/CS/ 2008/2024, it is praying for a declaration that the purported board dissolution and removal of its Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and executive directors on October 29, 2024, was unlawful, null and void.

  
Defendants are the interim management board appointed by NAICOM, namely Dr Haruna Mustafa, Jacob Erhabor, Wasiu Amao, Oremeyi Longe, Anthony Achebe and Halimatu Khabee, as well as NAICOM’s Director of Legal, Enforcement & Market Development, Dr Talmiz Usman and Minister of Finance.
  
The plaintiff is praying the court to determine whether NAICOM complied with provisions of the National Insurance Corporation Act and the Insurance Act and the Prudential Guidelines for Insurers and Reinsurers in Nigeria 2015 in the purported board dissolution and removal of African Alliance CEO and executive directors, as well as the appointment of the interim management board.
  
The plaintiff, through its counsel, Tayo Oyetibo (SAN), also asked the court to determine whether NAICOM acted in bad faith and unreasonably in exercising its powers under the laws.
  
The plaintiff is praying the court to hold that the act of NAICOM in seeking the approval of the Minister of Finance to take over the management of African Alliance while its application for consent to sell its assets in Pension Alliance Limited (PAL) was pending with the commission, was unreasonable, in bad faith and unlawful.
  
African Alliance urged the court to nullify the dissolution of its board and the appointment of an interim management board as contained in NAICOM’s letter dated October 29, 2024, and signed by one Talmiz Usman for being unlawful, null and void.
  
The plaintiff prayed for an injunction restraining the defendants, especially the first to sixth defendants, whether by themselves, their representatives, privies or agents from dealing with or selling/disposing of any assets of African Alliance.
  
In a supporting affidavit to the originating summons, African Alliance stated that NAICOM frustrated its efforts to raise funds and acted in bad faith in the dissolution of its management and board. 
  
In the said affidavit, African Alliance stated that Pensions Alliance Limited (PAL) is a company that was incorporated in 2005 with two shareholders – African Alliance (49 per cent shareholding) and FSDH Holding (51 per cent).
  
The plaintiff said for reasons well known to NAICOM, PAL failed to hold its Annual General Meeting (AGM) that would have allowed it to consider and declare dividends to the shareholders, which would have formed part of the operational funds of African Alliance as the investment in PAL was made in the interest of the company and its shareholders. 
  
African Alliance stated that it submitted a Business Turnaround Plan (BTP) to NAICOM outlining its short-term, medium-term, and long-term plans to address the issues raised by the commission.
  
The key component of the short-term plan was to secure bridge financing through the sale of the plaintiff’s 49 per cent asset in PAL, following which NAICOM directed it to inject N6 billion into the company within 90 days from July 1, 2024.
  
According to the company, NAICOM still went behind to publish a notice that it had put Africa Alliance under its Regulatory Order.  No date has been fixed for the hearing.

In this article

0 Comments