The Guardian
Email YouTube Facebook Instagram Twitter WhatsApp

INEC’s partisanship fuels electoral violence, says Fayose


Chairman, Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Prof. Mahmood Yakubu.

Chairman, Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Prof. Mahmood Yakubu.

Ekiti State governor, Mr Ayodele Fayose, has faulted the Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Professor Mahmood Yakubu on reasons for the renewed electoral violence in the country.

Fayose alleged that the INEC chairman has made the electoral commission partisan in favour of the ruling All progressives Congress (APC).

“Violence returned to our electoral process because of INEC partisanship and manipulation of the electoral process in the favour of the All Progressives Congress,” Fayose said in a statement issued on Wednesday, by his Special Assistant on Public Communications and New Media, Lere Olayinka.

“Rather than lamenting, the INEC chairman should return the electoral commission to what he met by detaching it from the APC, which INEC has obviously merged with,” adding that; “if INEC is neutral as it used to be before APC took power, there won’t be electoral violence.”

“There were elections in Nigeria between 2011 and 2015, and those elections were credible, such that Nigerians were sure that popular candidates and parties would emerge victorious because votes were allowed to count. Then, violence was no longer part of our electoral process. But sadly, this present INEC has destroyed all those gains
and returned Nigeria to the era of ballot box snatching.”

He said it was shameful that after casting their votes, votes counted and announced publicly, Nigerians now need to police their votes to collation centres to prevent figures already entered into relevant INEC forms from being altered.

The governor, who counselled Professor Mahmood Yakubu to be mindful of his name and purge the electoral commission under him of partisanship and election manipulation, said; there was no way President Muhammadu Buhari would have been elected if INEC, under Prof Attahiru Jega was the way it is now.

He questioned the rationale behind the jettisoning of the system introduced by Prof Jega, in which accreditation of voters is done at the same time in all polling units from 8 am to 1 pm while voting will commence after the number of accredited voters are known and counting of votes is done at the same time.

“By returning to the old system of accreditation and voting at the same time, and destroying the credibility of our electoral process, such that unpopular candidates are now having edge over and above those acceptable to the people, INEC by itself caused the electoral violence witnessed in the last 12 months.

“Even judges that will sit on election matters are now pre-arranged and picked even before the election, such that after using INEC and security agencies to pervert the will of the people, tribunals are used to authenticate the electoral fraud.

“The reality, therefore, is that only INEC can put an end to electoral violence and the only way to do it is for the commission to be neutral,” he said.

Receive News Alerts on Whatsapp: +2348136370421

  • vincentumenyiora

    Righteousness exalts a nations but sin is a reproach/ curse to any people! Prov. 14. 34; Pa 132. this part reason you are having problem in Nigeria! Rather than call the owner of the solutions you’re using you pretend to be the owner and you are talking about corruption – its doesn’t work! The same thing is happening in your corruption exercise – the government has been appealed to to study the solutions handed in bit for the Nigerian factor – the naivety in Nigerian leadership you are still dithering about how to get about (round) the problem – we are all witnesses!!

  • Christopher Adodo

    History shows that most Politicians
    in Nigeria are bad losers including the current President. However, the INEC chairman must be fair, unbiased and just in his duties to Nigerians. There is justification for concern because of increased in violence and deaths over election.
    The question is must INEC chairman come from same geographical areas with the President? Morally and fairness, absolutely no.