The Guardian
Email YouTube Facebook Instagram Twitter

NYSC as a metaphor for Nigeria

NYSC  members

NYSC members

The NYSC programme has been in the news lately following the death of three ‘Corpers’ across the nation. In most countries, tragic events like these would lead to a bout of soul-searching followed by reforms to ensure such deaths do not happen again. But Nigeria is not most countries.

I dislike the NYSC programme and think it is a waste of time and resources. But my reasons for not liking it are slightly different – I think it is an unfair way for government to spend money.

Let’s start from the beginning. Depending on who you ask, there are between 8 and 10 million Nigerian children between the ages of 7 and 14 who are not in school at all. Government doesn’t spend any money on these kids as they are not even in the system. To be fair, primary education is the responsibility of state governments but if these kids don’t get into primary school at all, they cannot get into secondary school where the federal government starts spending money on them.

The federal government takes over the funding of education from the secondary school level. Taking the 2016 budget as our guide, the amount spent on all the secondary schools in Nigeria by the federal government comes to just under N40bn. The budget lists 104 secondary schools that share this money. But between primary and secondary school, an estimated 7.2 million children, aged between 15 and 19 had dropped off, based on 2010 figures. The real problem appears to be crossing from JSS to SSS. In some states, only 16% of children cross this hurdle.

You can see the numbers are adding up. Millions don’t enter the pipeline at all and millions more drop off along the way. The whole thing looks like some kind of hunger games or survival of the fittest. Based on 2013 figures, only 1.7 million candidates registered to write JAMB for admission into university. They were competing for just 400,000 places which meant that another 1.3 million students had to drop off. And how much does the federal government then spend on the ‘lucky’ few hundred thousand who make it into higher institutions? In the 2016 budget, a total of 90 higher institutions shared an incredible N325bn – 68% of the entire education budget.

So to recap. If you are lucky enough to even get into primary school at all, you have tried. Government will spend some coins on you. If you are persistent enough to get through to secondary school, you get more money spent on you by government. If you then make it to university at all, government then opens the funding tap to educate you. And then, if you are able to make it out of higher institutions, you then qualify for even more spending via the NYSC programme. By university, the damage is usually done – if you had not been properly educated through primary and secondary school, you’re unlikely to make it up in university.

In 2016, the federal government budgeted N67bn to be spent on something like 260,000 youth corpers taking part in the NYSC programme.

To make matters worse, the N19,000 the government pays ‘Corpers’ monthly is not means tested. Whether you are rich or poor, you get paid the money. Whether you want it or not, you get it. Unsurprisingly, the programme is now struggling given the crisis in the government’s finances. Why do we do things this way?

It is bad enough that government is pouring the vast majority of the resources on the end of the education process after millions of children and students have fallen away. It then adds insult to injury by spending twice what it spends on secondary education on paying and camping corpers for one year. Does it not matter that we are failing millions of children who don’t even enter into school at all and those who fall by the wayside? Money is not infinite which means that money spent in one place cannot be spent in another place. Every naira spent is a trade off of one need for another. And the way we spend money on education says a lot about the kind of country we are.

A lot of people do not want to take part in the NYSC programme. That means there are people who will gladly give up the money government is paying them just to get out of the programme. Yet, government insists on paying them. There are some who don’t mind doing it, this is fine. Surely the solution to this is to make the programme voluntary so that the government is only paying those who really want to be there (and saving money in the process)?

The NYSC programme is a metaphor for Nigeria. Even when things are obviously in need of change, it is as if they cannot be changed. Edmund Burke once said that a state without the means of some change is without the means of its conservation. If you are unable to change things even when it is obvious that they need to be changed, then you are condemned to slow decay.

Is Nigeria capable of self-correction? The National Assembly is now talking about NYSC as a result of the recent deaths. But what happens when things go quiet again? Will we just continue with the programme as if it’s ok and does not need reform? Even saving half of the cost of NYSC and pouring it into secondary education will do wonders.

A country that spends all its money on the few who are able to make it to the end of a brutal process while ignoring the millions who fall by the wayside is a country without the means of its conservation.


In this article:
Feyi FawehinmiNYSC


  • Mr Q

    Nice one Feyi!! I am willing to even go a step further and say that some people feel so strongly about opting out of the scheme that they would gladly pay to opt out of this scheme.

    My Solution: Make the scheme voluntary with those who want to opt out allowed to do so by paying for it and use the revenue from this to set-off expenses incurred by those seeking to participate.

  • Abia_Man

    We had similar decisions to make on reforming the Nigeria program in 2011. Well meaning Nigerian officials ended the fuel subsidy regime, a first step in ending the hellish existence of its citizens and freeing them from the false promises of “national cakeism”. Even the owners of Nigeria a.k.a the Royal Niger Company agreed to the change. Yes, the UK and USA said fine, end the subsidy! We could save billions of dollars yearly, encourage refinery investors, create hundreds of thousands of jobs and most importantly relieve the Niger Delta from the burden of funding the subsidy. In fact the problem of electricity in Nigeria is largely due to the ownership of oil and gas resources by the federal government.
    Yet you Feyi supported the forces that foiled the reforms. You supported Buhari and the APC who were opposed to these reforms and the recommendations of the national conference. You never talk of the people that bear the burden of funding the NYSC, FG, Schools , police etc. The Ikwerres, Ijaws, Egbema, Ibibio Ogonis are real people and it is really bizarre that your writings ignore property rights of these folks. Property rights are a critical economic issue. The violation of their property rights has set in motion all kinds of political and economy tragedies that has befallen Nigerians. It is time you man up and discuss real relief for all our peoples- regional and ethnic autonomy, fiscal federalism, and resource control.

You may also like