Stakeholders divided as Lagos enforces korope ban at Lekki

Lagos State Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu

The decision by the Lagos State government to enforce a ban on Korope vehicles (small yellow minibuses) along the Lekki–Epe Expressway has triggered sharp reactions from key stakeholders, exposing deep divisions over safety, regulation and the readiness of alternative transport systems.

The restriction, introduced in February 2026 under the Bus Reform Initiative (BRI), bars Korope operators from the Lekki corridor, particularly the Ajah axis and confines them to inner routes.

The policy, described by the State government as a data-driven and permanent move, is aimed at replacing informal minibuses with regulated, higher-capacity buses in line with the Lagos Strategic Transportation Master Plan.

However, transport experts have urged caution, warning that policy implementation must be matched with practical alternatives.

Professor of Transport Planning and Policy at the Lagos State University, Samuel Odewumi, noted that transportation is driven by necessity, warning that bans without viable substitutes could backfire.

“My take is that transportation is a derived demand. When it becomes necessary, people will resort to any mode. A viable, affordable and available option must be put in place before placing a ban.”

Odewumi who doubles as the acting Vice-Chancellor, University of Uyo, added that without empirical data to justify the policy’s effectiveness, it remains difficult to categorically determine whether the restriction was appropriate or premature.

His position reflects concerns among commuters who have faced delays and increased waiting times since the enforcement began.

From the private sector, however, there is strong backing for the government’s stance.

Deputy Managing Director of RT Briscoe Plc, Femi Eguaikhide, argued that korope operations on major highways violated established transport norms.

Eguaikhide, who is also the Chairman of the Auto and Allied Sector Group of the Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry (LCCI), maintained that compliance with traffic laws was essential for urban order.

He urged the operators to adjust by focusing on feeder routes. At the same time, he acknowledged the government’s responsibility to prevent service gaps.

He said: “The minibuses by their design are meant for last-mile transportation and not on a major expressway like the Lekki–Epe Expressway. If we want a sane society, we must learn to live by the rules governing it.

“The government needs to continuously invest in public transportation so that there is no vacuum created. If adequate public transport had been available, there would have been no need for korope operators to move onto the expressway in the first place.”

Korope operators, meanwhile, have resisted the move, staging protests that temporarily disrupted traffic along the corridor.

They argued that the ban threatens their livelihoods and fails to reflect the on-the-ground realities of commuter demand.

For residents, the policy has produced mixed outcomes. While some commuters support the ban as a step towards safer and more orderly roads, others have complained of longer queues and limited bus availability, especially during peak hours.

In response, the government said it has begun deploying about 200 medium- to high-capacity buses on key routes such as Ajah–CMS, Ajah–Oshodi and Ajah–Berger to cushion the impact.

As the debate continues, the Lekki korope ban has become a test case for Lagos’ broader transport reform agenda, highlighting the delicate balance between regulation, commuter needs, and the economic survival of informal transport operators.

Join Our Channels