The House of Representatives Caucus of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) has kicked against what it described as looming judicial interference in its leadership structure, warning that any court pronouncement on the party’s internal affairs would contravene the law and undermine democratic norms.

At a press conference held at the national Assembly complex, addressed by Mr Afam Ogene, the caucus expressed concern over the pending Supreme Court pronouncement expected to determine the recognised leadership of the party.

The lawmakers argued that issues relating to party congresses and leadership fall strictly within the internal jurisdiction of political parties.
Citing provisions of the Electoral Act 2026, adding that the courts lack the authority to adjudicate on such matters, insisting that any judicial pronouncement to that effect would amount to an overreach and a violation of established legal boundaries.

The lawmakers further alleged that the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) was complicit in the crisis by recognising a faction they described as illegitimate, rather than the leadership led by David Mark, which they said had fulfilled all necessary regulatory conditions.

They warned that such actions by the electoral body, if left unchecked, could effectively exclude the ADC from participating in future elections and weaken opposition politics in the country.

Raising broader concerns, the caucus alleged a coordinated effort involving elements within INEC and the judiciary to influence the outcome of the case, a development they said threatens the credibility of both institutions.

In response, the lawmakers disclosed plans to petition the National Judicial Council (NJC) over what they termed “judicial compromise and malfeasance,” calling for a thorough investigation into the conduct of judicial officers involved.

The caucus also referenced concerns earlier raised by the President of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Afam Osigwe, regarding the growing perception of political influence on the judiciary.

While focusing on the leadership dispute, the lawmakers also reiterated concerns about the neutrality of INEC, including allegations of partisan conduct against its chairman, Professor Joash Amupitan.

They called for his removal, arguing that confidence in the electoral process must be preserved ahead of the 2027 general elections.

The caucus lamented what it described as a decline in judicial independence, recalling the legacy of past jurists such as Chukwudifu Oputa, Niki Tobi, Kayode Eso, and Mohammed Uwais, who upheld the integrity of the bench.

They urged Nigerians, civil society groups, and the media to remain vigilant and committed to protecting democratic institutions, stressing that both the judiciary and INEC must act within the bounds of the law to sustain public trust.