Chief Executive Officer of Meta, Mark Zuckerberg, has expressed optimism about the future of Artificial Intelligence (AI), saying it will rather create more jobs than unleash doom.

Zuckerberg made the argument in an essay titled: ‘The Future is for Everyone’, in which he outlined his vision for the development of advanced AI and what he described as “personal superintelligence” that could give individuals capabilities far beyond what is currently possible.

His position contrasts with growing concerns among workers, economists and technology leaders that increasingly capable AI systems could automate large parts of knowledge work, displace workers and concentrate economic power among a small number of technology companies.

Zuckerberg said the current debate around advanced AI has become excessively focused on its potential to cause harm, despite the technology’s potential to improve human capabilities.

“Still, it is surprising that the discourse around many developing AI is so filled with doom. I do not understand why anyone who believes that AI will eliminate most jobs and much of humanity’s relevance would rush to build that future.”

“The notion that AI is so dangerous that the only safe path is an extreme concentration of power seems inherently problematic,” Zuckerberg added.

He argued that previous technological advances also generated fears about their impact on workers but ultimately contributed to higher living standards and expanded economic opportunities.

“We believe this will be true with AI as well, and the abundance of the future can be shared by everyone,” he said.

Zuckerberg’s central argument is that advanced AI should be used to expand what individuals can accomplish rather than simply automate existing jobs.

“Invention, not automation, will be the greatest contribution of superintelligence,” he said.

He argued that AI could help people discover new medicines, develop products, conduct research and create businesses that would previously have required much larger teams.

Zuckerberg also challenged the assumption that AI-driven productivity necessarily means fewer jobs.

He expects this could lead to a future where the number of employees in individual companies falls while the overall number of businesses increases.