‘Fruit juice increases risk of early death even more than soft drinks’
A new study found an increased risk of dying early from any cause for people who consumed a lot of sugary drinks.
United States (US) researchers compared, for the first time, 100 percent fruit juices with sugar-sweetened beverages such as cola and lemonade.
They found very similar associations for both fruit juices and sugary drinks with an increased risk of dying early, though they said more research was needed.
An expert described the study as important but said there was no risk from a single 150ml glass of fruit juice per day.
The new research, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), analyzed data from 13,440 people. Their intake of sugary drinks and 100 percent fruit juices was recorded via a questionnaire on how often they consumed the drinks.
During an average follow-up of six years, there were 1,000 deaths from any cause and 168 deaths from coronary heart disease.
Typically, people in the study got 8.4 percent of their calorie intake each day from sugar-sweetened drinks and four percent from 100 percent fruit juice.
People were considered to have a high intake of these drinks if 10 percent or more of energy intake came from these drinks compared with those with a low intake (less than five percent).
After factors such as obesity were taken into account, those with the highest intake had an 11 percent increased risk of dying from any cause for every extra 12oz of sugar-sweetened drink consumed, and a 24 percent increased risk for every extra 12oz of fruit juice consumed.
The researchers, including from Emory University in Atlanta and Cornell University in New York, said: “These results suggest higher consumption of sugary beverages, including fruit juice, is associated with increased mortality.
“The nutrient content of 100 percent fruit juices and SSBs (sugar-sweetened beverages) is very similar.
“While 100 percent fruit juices contain some vitamins and phytonutrients that are missing from most SSBs, the predominant ingredients in both are sugar and water.
“Although the sugar in SSBs is added during processing and the sugar in 100 percent fruit juice occurs naturally, the specific sugars they provide for the body to process are essentially the same, and the biochemical response when metabolized is the same.”
The authors suggested a few possible reasons for the increased risk of dying from consumption of sugary drinks.
Obesity is obviously the main factor, they said, but once that is taken into account, research suggests that sugary drinks increase insulin resistance.
Other factors may be that consuming fructose alters blood lipid levels, markers of inflammation and blood pressure, while high glucose consumption has been associated with insulin resistance and diabetes.
Also, grapefruit juice is already listed as a substance to avoid when taking QT-prolonging medications because it increases the toxicity of many drugs.
Investigators have now confirmed the QT-prolonging effects of grapefruit juice in a new study and call for a stronger warning to patients who are taking QT-prolonging drugs or who have long QT syndrome because of the potential risk.
They report their findings in HeartRhythm, the official journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, published by Elsevier.
There are over 200 medications that prolong the QT interval, the time it takes for your heart muscle to recharge between beats.
The list includes not only antiarrhythmic drugs, but also medications with no cardiac indications such as some antibiotics, antihistamines, and antipsychotic drugs. These drugs work mainly by blocking a specific “IKr” potassium channel on the myocardial (cardiac muscle) cell membrane, thus prolonging the repolarization in the ventricles of the heart. Abnormalities in the QT interval can also be caused by genetic conditions such as long QT syndrome.
Investigators tested the effects of grapefruit juice on the QT interval following the same stringent criteria used by the pharmaceutical industry to test new drugs before market release.
The study was performed according to the “Guidelines for the Clinical Evaluation of QT/QTc for Non-antiarrhythmic Drugs,” namely, a randomized crossover design, accurate and blinded QT analysis. As positive control, they used moxifloxacin, an antibiotic with known, albeit small, QT-prolonging properties.
The study confirmed that grapefruit juice prolongs the QT interval. Among healthy volunteers the net QT prolongation was small, but comparable to that caused by moxifloxacin. The grapefruit-induced QT prolongation was greater in females than in males and more so in patients with congenital long QT syndrome.
Meanwhile, Dr. Gunter Kuhnle, associate professor in nutrition and health at the University of Reading, said: “This is a very important study, especially as fruit juices are often seen as a ‘healthy’ alternative to sugar-sweetened beverages, even though they often contain much more sugar (especially smoothies).
“Fruit juices can provide vitamins and even some fibre, but there is little health benefit beyond this: the amount of phytochemical found in juices is too low to have any further beneficial effect, and there is no beneficial health effect from so-called antioxidants.
“If the association is shown to be causal (which we do not know yet), this would have a number of implications: first of all, it would suggest that it does not matter whether sugary drinks are lemonades or fruit juices.
“This is important, as fruit juices and smoothies are not commonly perceived as sugary drinks. Secondly, it would suggest purported health benefits of fruit juices are not sufficient to counteract their sugar content.
“Fruit juices are a poor replacement for actual fruit consumption, in particular as they can be much more easily over-consumed.
“Indeed, a 150ml glass of orange juice is made from about two oranges – but it takes much longer to eat two oranges than to drink the juice.
“In the UK, the general recommendation is that a 150ml glass of fruit juice can provide one of the five-a-day, but not more.
“This is less than half of the amount found in this study to result in a modest increase in mortality, so there is no suggestion from this study that one glass a day is problematic.”
No comments yet