Former medical student of the University of Ibadan (UI), Dr. Oluwole Daini has declared that any attempt to prevent the execution of the unanimously signed, stamped and returned withdrawal by consent process in the appeal marked CA/A/702/2013, and dated December 24, 2020 shall constitute an act of treasonable felony.

According to him, any such infraction will be considered a crime, which are punishable under the Criminal Code or the Penal or some other laws of the Federation of Nigeria.

He made this declaration in a press conference he held in Abuja October 10, titled, “President Bola Tinubu saved Nigeria from being a failed State,” following the expiration of the time he gave to the president and the Directorate of State Security (DSS) to disassociate themselves from the alleged plot to prevent him from executing the said decision of court.

He said since the president, the DSS and others have failed to provide him with the documentary evidence he requested repeatedly from them, it means that they have extricated themselves from the plot to violate the laws of the land.

His words: “It is hereby placed on record that the expiration of the times stated in all the notices of implementation including the rejoinder dated August 28, 2023 through the UI Vice Chancellor (VC) to many other entities; the expiration of the time stated in my correspondence dated September 07, 2023 to the Inspector General of Police; the expiration of the times stated in my correspondences dated August 14, 21, and September 04, 11 and 21, 2023, to the Director General of the DSS; and the expiration of the time stated in the correspondence dated September 29, 2023 by my Estate Surveyors and Valuers (Sola Olaniyi Consulting) to the Director General of the DSS, all serve as additional evidences in support of the fact that the acquiescence of Mr. President/Visitor to the correspondences dated August 03, 17, 31, 2023 and September 19, 2023 had not only saved Nigeria from becoming a failed State, but also served as evidence that Mr. President has not breached the oath of his Office.”

He held that the president, who is the visitor to UI had been informed through those correspondences that the Federal Government, the Attorney General of the Federation, the Federal Ministry of Education, the National Universities Commission, the Court of Appeal and the Federal High Court and their alter egos as well as the President himself have been extricated in the matter.

According to him, if those entities mentioned were not extricated, any form of their involvement in the administration of justice would have constituted a breach and/or a contravention of different laws.

Those laws, he noted, are Sections 1(1)(2)(3), 130(1)(2), Items 21(A)(I)(B)(G) Third Schedule Part I Federal Executive Bodies and Items 9, 13, 18(6) of the Fifth Schedule Part I Code of Conduct for Public Officers (General) and President Oath of Office in the 1999 Constitution (as altered).

Others are Sections 5(3)(B), 9, 12 and the Fourth Schedule [Section 8] Items 3, 4 and 5 of the University of Ibadan Act; and Sections 41(a), 59, 292 and/or 293 and/or 294, 373, 374, 375, 376, 393, 464, 465, 466 and 467 of the Criminal Code Act; Fourth Schedule [Section 8] Items 3, 4 and 5 of the University of Ibadan Act, among other Laws of the Federation of Nigeria.

“And this would have been tantamount to Nigeria becoming a failed State, with all the attendant consequences on statehood,” he declared.