From Ameh Ochojila Abuja
A professor of International Environmental and Public International Law, Cyprian F. Edward-Ekpo, has called on President Bola Tinubu to rescind the suspension of Governor Siminalayi Fubara before the hearing of the suit filed by some governors on the matter before the Supreme Court.

Edward-Ekpo, who is also the Director, Institute of Law Research & Development of United Nations (ILAWDUN), Washington D.C, USA, said the swift and corrective action will help reaffirm the president’s commitment to democracy and reposition his image as a leader who values the rule of law, and demonstrate that he listens to the people.

Following the president’s suspension of Governor Fubara, his deputy, Ngozi Odu and members of the state assembly on March 18 and the appointment of a retired military as sole administrator, the National Assembly two days later ratified the action.

Consequently, seven governors of the opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) comprising Adamawa, Bauchi, Bayelsa, Enugu, Osun, Plateau and Zamfara states have filed a suit at the Supreme Court challenging the constitutionality of the action.

Prof. Edward-Ekpo said the president, allowing the Supreme Court to dismiss the matter either by technicality or by forcing the parties to withdraw the suit, as some people anticipate, would damage his reputation as a pro-democracy advocate.

He said, “I am aware that the courts, particularly the Supreme Court, are currently saddled with this matter. Mr. President, heeding my humble appeal is your best course of action.

“I understand that you are caught between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea— a difficult choice—waiting for the court’s decision on this constitutional crisis or taking the more prudent and popular path of correcting the error now.

“Let me explain why the latter is the wiser option: (a) If the Supreme Court upholds the emergency declaration and the suspension of a democratically elected state governor and legislature by another democratically elected official (the President and the National Assembly), it will permanently stain your legacy.

“You will be remembered as the President who undermined constitutional principles and legitimised illegality. Regardless of the court’s ruling, the perception will be that the Supreme Court was influenced by you.

“However, in their commitment to justice and constitutionalism, the Supreme Court Justices cannot, in good conscience, sustain such an obvious constitutional violation. Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution does not grant a democratically elected President the power to suspend or remove a democratically elected state government under a federal system—under any guise.”

He argued that it also does not empower the National Assembly to take a voice vote to determine a two-thirds majority or override constitutional provisions to justify a state of emergency.

The action of imposing a sole administrator on a state, he said, would directly contradict Section 1(2) of the 1999 Constitution, which explicitly forbids governance by a military-style sole administrator.