The Ijaw Women Advocates for Justice across the Ijaw Nation and diaspora have cautioned against what they described as sustained attempts to try former Minister of Petroleum Resources, Mrs. Diezani Alison-Madueke, in the court of public opinion while her legal proceedings continue in the United Kingdom.

Speaking at a press conference in Abuja on Monday, the group said the ongoing commentary, selective narratives, and media sensationalism surrounding the case risk undermining the integrity of the judicial process.

They insisted that justice must remain strictly within the confines of the court, warning that public discourse should not be allowed to influence or pre-empt legal outcomes.

Dr. Timiebi Koripamo-Agary, who spoke on behalf of the group, said it was important to draw a clear line between courtroom proceedings and media-driven narratives.

“Stop trying Diezani in the court of public opinion while the real legal process continues,” she said, stressing that justice must not be reduced to speculation or headlines.

The group maintained that the principles of due process, fair hearing, and presumption of innocence must be respected at all times, regardless of the individuals involved.

According to them, only a competent court has the authority to assess evidence, weigh arguments, and deliver a verdict, not the media or public commentary.

They expressed concern that increasing sensational reporting and repeated commentary could distort facts and create unfair perceptions around an ongoing case.

The Ijaw women therefore urged journalists, opinion leaders, and members of the public to exercise restraint and avoid narratives that could prejudice the judicial process.

They further called on stakeholders to allow the United Kingdom legal system to conclude its proceedings without interference, pressure, or external influence.

Reaffirming their position, the group said justice must remain anchored on law, evidence, and procedure, not emotions, assumptions, or media framing.

They stressed that allowing courts to function without distortion is essential to maintaining fairness and credibility in any justice system.

The statement concluded with a strong appeal for respect for due process, insisting that only the court—not public opinion—has the mandate to determine the outcome of the case.