US top court to consider use of gas on deathrow inmate
The top US court has halted Russel Bucklew’s execution twice before, most recently last month after his lawyers argued that a lethal injection could cause intense suffering.
The US Constitution prohibits cruel and unusual punishment, and a series of botched executions with lethal injections has spurred debate over the constitutionality of this most common method for putting inmates to death in the United States.
The justices on Monday ordered attorneys on both sides to present arguments on whether gas can be used as an alternative, as proposed by Bucklew’s attorney Cheryl Pilate.
They were asked to “prove what procedures would be used to administer (Bucklew’s) proposed alternative method of execution, the severity and duration of pain likely to be produced, and how they compare to the State’s method of execution.”
Bucklew suffers from a rare congenital disease known as cavernous hemangioma, which leaves him with growths on his head and neck. Those tumors could react poorly to drugs used in lethal injections and cause Bucklew to choke or bleed during execution, advocates argue.
Bucklew is on death row for the 1996 killing of a romantic rival and the rape of a former girlfriend. He escaped from prison shortly after his arrest and attacked the mother of his ex-girlfriend with a hammer. She survived.
Bucklew was to be put to death in 2014 but the execution was stayed by the Supreme Court for the first time after a botched execution in Oklahoma involving a lethal injection.
The American Civil Liberties Union has argued a “substantial risk” exists that Bucklew would choke during a lethal injection because his airways are compromised by a vascular tumor.
The rights group also warned that the tumor could burst, causing heavy bleeding and leading to “torturous” punishment.
The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, for its part, has called for Bucklew’s death sentence to be commuted.
No comments yet