Buhari’s second list and public pressure
IF the ability to listen is a virtue a good leader should have, President Muhammadu Buhari seems to be leaving no one in doubt that he has it. He has even proved to possess a greater virtue of acting on the meaningful advice he has received in the course of listening.
Yet, there is a problem. There is a problem with how the president has manifested these virtues. And this borders on self-sabotage.
As a leader, it is right if the president has a reason at any given time to listen to the opinions of the citizens and act accordingly. But it is wrong if as a leader, it is the citizens who always tell the president what to do. Since the inauguration of his administration, it is only on a few occasions that Buhari has not travestised these virtues.
A memorable one was when on his own initiative he relocated a strategic military team to Maiduguri and he began shuttle diplomacy that took him to neighbouring countries in a bid to seek their support for Nigeria’s anti-terror war. Perhaps, he got these right because when it comes to military matters, the president as a retired general is on a very familiar terrain.
But in the realm of actual governance, he flounders. Buhari gained so much political capital during the electioneering when he promised to publicly declare his assets. But he tried to renege on this promise after winning the election. His spokesmen instigated the controversy that he was not the one but his political party, the All Progressives Congress (APC), which made the promise. But when public pressure mounted, Buhari had to fulfil his promise. And the haphazard manner the assets’ declaration was presented to the public showed that he was only responding to public pressure.
It was because the citizens asked Buhari to fulfil the constitutional requirement of having ministers as part of his government that he decided to have them. Left to him, he would prefer to run a government without ministers as he denigrated them as noisemakers. After the citizens had waited in vain for the ministers, Buhari again responded to public pressure. He promised to unveil his minsters after four months.
At the end of the four months, Buhari submitted a list of ministerial nominees to the Senate. There was further pressure from the public. The citizens wondered that if it took four months for him to submit the first list of ministerial nominees, it might take him another four months to present the second list.
In response to this pressure, Buhari submitted the second list. Before submitting it, Buhari obviously listened to the citizens and acted on their advice again. He heeded the advice of the citizens that he should not load his cabinet with former government officials over whom corruption charges are hanging and whose fossilised ideas of governance would endanger his change agenda. The result is that on this second list that the president submitted to the Senate on Monday, there is a slight break from the pattern of the first one.
The names of people who could be regarded as experienced technocrats who have not really been in government diminish the presence of politicians on the second list . But on the whole, this list is refreshing to the extent that even though there are politicians, they have not been conspicuously smeared with the grime of corruption that obviously discredits the first list.
But apparently because the citizens were not privy to the plan of the president to submit two ministerial nominees’ lists, he did not enjoy the benefit of their input. Thus another wrong step. For if the citizens had known that Buhari would submit two lists, they would have advised him to submit the second one first. If he had done this, it would have been a wonderful boost to the Buhari administration .
The citizens would have applauded him for judiciously spending the four months he used to search for ministerial nominees to run his government. He would not have drawn the ire of the public for delaying the submission of the first list and for loading it with discredited old politicians.
Apart from those who have been in politics, the second list includes people who have recorded great successes in their different careers. They are not like the desperate politicians of the first list. Obviously, it would be difficult for the president to regard high achievers such as the vice chancellor of the University of Ibadan, Prof. Isaac Adewole as mere noisemakers. What the president needs is to galvanise them into aligning themselves with his change agenda by creating the right environment for them to flourish.
However, the second list failed to allay the worry that the first list generated. The two lists show that the president does not have so much respect for the youths. Yet, it was this segment of the population that drove on the social media the campaign for his election. But since the country is in a dire crisis, the success of the ministers would obviate the injustice of the exclusion of the youths from the Buhari’s cabinet.
After all, what the youths like other Nigerians need now are good jobs, regular supply of electricity, good roads, and functional educational and electricity sectors. And where are the women from the southern part of the country? If the negligible number of women on the lists does not meet the demand of gender parity, there is a greater variant of gender inequality. The few women who are on the ministerial nominees’ lists are from the northern part of the country. Perhaps, the president is wary of women from the south. Is it because they were largely the ruin of his predecessor?
The unbroken pattern of the president’s exposure to criticism because of his inability to properly demonstrate the virtues of listening and acting on the citizens’ input betrays the poor quality of his kitchen cabinet. And this is the problem of his choosing only those he believes he can trust to work closely with him from his northern part of the country. If he had the right people as his kitchen cabinet, he would not need to do what is right as a result of public pressure .
Here the responsibility of the citizens becomes very clear. Nigerians apparently voted for a person they thought had a clear vision of where the country should be. They thought they voted for a leader who would lead the way and they would follow.
Of course, a leader needs to be nudged to do some things. But this should only be occasionally. The citizens never really anticipated that they would be the ones to guide the president at every stage of his presidential journey. But since this is the case, for the president to succeed in transforming the country, he needs the support of the citizens. If it is only public pressure that has made him to take the right steps so far, it means that it is the citizens’ input that would sustain him on the path of good governance.
• Dr. Onomuakpokpo is a member of The Guardian Editorial Board.
.
Get the latest news delivered straight to your inbox every day of the week. Stay informed with the Guardian’s leading coverage of Nigerian and world news, business, technology and sports.
1 Comments
It would have been refreshing if the statement made by Senator Akpabio, when he remarked that Dr. Kachikwu was neither an APC nor PDP could also be said about the other nominees on the first list. As regards the issue of corruption, the senators did not do a thorough job on Fashola when he alluded he never signed cheques. That defence was ambiguous.
We will review and take appropriate action.