Most petroleum-related environmental disputes in the Niger Delta region are resolved via litigation and Alternative Dispute Resolution processes, with litigation involving over 95% of the cases. My research as a PhD candidate at the University of the Witwatersrand in South Africa involves an analysis of over 300 petroleum-related environmental disputes in the region, handled by law courts and non-judicial institutions.

[ad]

The disputes specifically concern crude oil and petroleum products spillage, natural waterway blockade and siltation, destruction of landscape and biodiversity, gas flaring, chemical and oil waste discharge, dredged waste dumping, and damages resulting from flare site energy vibration, pipeline laying, and other petroleum activities.

The case analysis indicates that the legal framework significantly influences several systemic defects in the current dispute resolution system involving petroleum-related environmental disputes in the Niger Delta region. While there are instances where legal intervention led to some form of redress such as compensation for victims of environmental harm and court orders for remediation of impacted areas, in most cases, attempts to seek redress for petroleum-related environmental wrongs were frustrated through exploitation of the legal framework, especially the Constitution, Limitation Laws, Evidence Act, Civil Procedure Rules of the courts, common law principles, and case law.

To enhance success in resolving petroleum-related environmental disputes in Nigeria, it is essential to have a sound and functional legal framework that takes into account the peculiar features of environmental disputes and the contexts in environmental dispute resolution. The legal framework should for instance inform the adoption of mechanisms or strategies aiding the recognition, inclusion, effective participation, and collaboration of the right stakeholders; proper utilization of relevant skills and expertise; power symmetry between the disputing parties; proper analysis and use of available scientific and other relevant information; and the development and implementation of appropriate solutions to issues in dispute.

[ad]

It is also crucial that it allows the adoption of processes that lead to a better understanding of the ecological system as well as providing a means of monitoring and assessing alteration impacts on the environment. Considering the gravity of the long-lasting impacts of petroleum on the environment, adoption strategies that minimise delays during dispute resolution and promote timely and effective responses to environmental issues is key.

READ ALSO: ‘Lagos real estate transactions transparent, environmentally-compliant’

To avoid undue frustration in dispute resolution, the legal framework needs to delineate the rights, obligations, and roles of the diverse environmental stakeholders and other social actors. More importantly, it should also be culturally sensitive, intelligible, and easily accessible to stakeholders since it cannot operate effectively without the lived experiences and knowledge of its subjects. Finally, it needs to promote competence and effectiveness of the process facilitators or coordinators, since incompetence can hamper the appropriate utilization of available information and skills or the productive engagement of stakeholders and the development of appropriate solutions to environmental issues.

Ikpokonte is a Chief State Counsel at the Rivers State Ministry of Justice, Nigeria, and a 2023 Mawazo Fellow pursuing a PhD in Law at the University of the Witwatersrand in South Africa.

[ad]