The Guardian
Email YouTube Facebook Instagram Twitter WhatsApp

Of institutions and Nigeria’s retarded development




THE plethora of conferences, workshops, seminars, all with the incontrovertible diagnosis of a failure to develop institutions as the major bane of Nigeria’s efforts at development, is the greatest advertisement of a nation long on ideas, but short on implementation.

After all, everybody knows that Nigeria’s retarded development could only be reversed with establishing and strengthening of institutions, instead of the present fixation on personalities, yet, little has been done to change tack.

As the Muhammadu Buhari administration takes off at the end of this month, this must change. The issue, again, came to the fore at Wema Bank’s 70th anniversary lecture titled, “Why Nations Succeed”.

In addition to the correct identification of a government’s power to set priorities with its control of the nation’s resources, the gathering seemed to have reached a consensus that strong institutions help build a nation.

It was observed that Nigeria’s present political and economic institutions have always given the advantage and opportunities to a few individuals such that power is wielded by and rotated within a cabal without any checks and balances.

After independence, military rule weakened the structures of the state, the civil society and all those institutions that should build a nation. Nigerians should know the ineffectiveness of military-style “task-force” approach and it must never be a preference to setting up enduring institutions for development.

In the 1980s for example, there was the Directorate of Food, Roads and Rural Infrastructure which duplicated the roles of existing ministries, departments and agencies that could have been strengthened. The graded rural roads have since been over-grown as bush all over the country.

Then, there was also the Petroleum Trust Fund (PTF) headed by General Buhari and which was constructing selected roads, building schools and hospitals nationwide.

Only recently, the outgoing government came up with the Subsidy Re-Investment and Empowerment Programme (SURE-P) that distributes funds to states and local councils, while also funding infrastructure, even when there are existing agencies for these functions. Interventionist measures are good, but must never be to the detriment of institutions.

Nigeria is a nation in which the road transport mode is responsible for the movement of more than 90 per cent of people, goods and services as well as the defence forces.

Yet, government’s intention in 1970 by the Yakubu Gowon administration to set up a Federal Highways Authority has suffered from lack of political will, since the delegation recommended in 1972, that the road agency be established “without delay.” The contents of that report, however relevant, were confined to the shelf.

Every idea of infrastructural development in Nigeria has suffered same fate. In the last decade, institutions have been destroyed; especially by people occupying positions of trust. What has become of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission? Currently, it is being perceived that the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) is waxing stronger, but there is however, palpable fear as to who would next lead it after the highly commendable tenure of Attahiru Jega.

The watch phrase should be that a man might leave a position, but the institutions stays, having entrenched the right culture and ethos. There is also the problem of the average Nigerian’s definition and perception of political office.

Why do people seek political power? The culture of service to the nation, which appreciates that after politics comes governance, must take root. This will put an end to policy somersaults, in which a succeeding government fails to develop on the legacy of the predecessor and abandons projects mid-stream so as to commence what it considers own priorities.

The attitude of the average Nigerian must also change. There is the unstated, yet strong mindset, that the holder of a political office will only look after his interest and those of his family, friends and associates.

This has been accepted and there is hardly any protestation by Nigerians, except for some bold attempts by the media. Thus, career politicians, who live on the system instead of living for it, are determined to be in office at all costs with the attendant monumental corruption.

Over the years, it has been the penchant of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (The World Bank) and its arm, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), to prescribe uniform policies for uneven terrains. But experience has shown that the prescription had seldom succeeded.

There is, afterall, the ubiquitous human factor as well as the constraints of culture and religion. The solution to Nigeria’s retarded development must come from within taking into cognizance the peculiar needs of the people.

There are sufficient well-trained Nigerians to champion home-grown policies for the development of the country while not undermining societal nuances. And one incontrovertible key point is the need to develop strong institutions that would evolve and function efficiently, regardless of who controls political power.

Receive News Alerts on Whatsapp: +2348136370421

  • amador kester

    Values are harbingers of institutional success or failure paradigms.What are our values? From time management skills to productive work ethics and transparency what do we score? Mental revolution is the deepest revolution and has our mindset been orientedto undertake nationbuilding tasks? The americans value what works or pragmatism,britons value experiential intelligence,germans value efficiency and excellence and they all moved mountains so what do we value apart from the devalued oilprice– buffetted naira? We spend much of out time in resplendent conferences,endless meetings even where mere policy directives,memos and tele or video conferencing could have served better.We are more keen at celebrating chieftaincy titles than attending a scientific exhibition of new technologies and not surprisingly our youths are more into reality shows and soccer watching raves while their westrn and chinese counterparts are the new billionaires of sofware and apps designs.Of course our youths finally take to secret culltism, where the african minds gravitates to extinction.So you see ,values are integral to institutional success paradigms and adaptability is synonymous with survivability.Are we aware there is a global shift from govt institutions to institutions that drive the private sector as the main engine of progressive transformation? Why do we lack such men and institutions public or private that can leap us from agrarian to an industrial and information age? Why does nigerria nay africaca lack the movers and locomotives of history found elsehere? History is mostly made by single trees that make forests.Even our university systems that sell grades to students are not aware d lecturers are breeding a corrupt generation to sabotage the nation…more later

  • Omoogun Ajayi

    ‘Even our university systems that’ …ought to provide the prime examples of how institutions work are in the top leagues of the defect from decay. As Kester rightly observed, we just need single examples of great Institutions to create a bandwagon of values and ‘progressive transformation’. Who will bell that cat!!