The Guardian
Email YouTube Facebook Instagram Twitter WhatsApp

The ban on souvenirs

Related

President Muhammadu Buhari

President Muhammadu Buhari

That the administration of President Muhammadu Buhari has banned the procurement and distribution of souvenirs at events organised or financed by the government is, no doubt, a welcome development. The events at which distribution of souvenirs such as bags, t-shirts, pens, writing pads, folders, and so on have been banned include conferences, seminars, workshops, symposia, retreats and assorted meetings and fora.

This is aimed at ensuring reduction in wasteful spending, promotion of efficiency and quantifiable savings for the country. Indeed, the overall objective is to reduce overhead cost in government operations.

It is one good step the government has taken and which all reasonable Nigerians believe will assist in the effective and efficient management of scarce resources, provided that total compliance by officials of ministries, departments, agencies and parastatals is achieved.

At a time like this when national revenue has significantly declined, when payment of contractors and salaries of government employees has become not only a challenge but a national embarrassment, it is a necessity that Nigerians review their ways of life and decide what desirable amendments can be made to survive. This is more exigent when considered that the country is also grappling with serious youth unemployment, inadequate and non-functional infrastructure, debts and an economy in recession. Any survival strategy that fails to take into account profiling expenditure with a view to eliminating unnecessary and needless costs will be missing a major plank upon which to build a solution. Nigeria needs to live within its means. That the government has identified costs associated with provision of souvenirs at some government functions for a ban is, therefore, commendable.

It is important to emphasise that the role played by conference bags, for example, has been eliminated by technology. The bags, were meant to enable participants carry conference papers. Today, a small computer flash drive can be used to copy all conference presentations. Furthermore, the papers presented can be forwarded to participants via their e-mail addresses. In effect, the need for bags at such events as conferences and seminars is, if anything, old-fashioned and a waste of funds.

Similar justification can be found for elimination of writing pads and pens. It is good enough that government is funding other costs associated with workshops and courses, such as tea/coffee breaks, lunch, and others but on what basis would a participant anchor a request on government to provide the writing materials? It is, therefore, obvious that the burden, if that is what it is, should rest on the invitee who accepts to participate. So, if government relieves itself of what its invitees are ordinarily in a position to provide for themselves, it can face other things more critical to the success of the events.

A hidden imperative from the ban is that it indirectly hits on the anti-corruption crusade. Purchase and distribution of various items, including souvenirs, have been veritable sources of corruption in government. That has been the basis of budget padding, over-invoicing and other forms of in-built corruption-supporting mechanisms. Thus, with this ban, a sure source of corruption has been dealt a blow, hopefully, permanently.

The ban should, however, create opportunities for the private sector to promote Nigerian-made products. Government should, therefore, encourage, at least small and medium scale enterprises (SMEs) to access the venues of its events free of charge to display their products to create awareness and generate purchases among participants and officials at such events. Any success recorded will not only encourage the SMEs but also empower them to produce more, leading to creation of employment opportunities. It may also lead to the initiation of exportation of the products, especially if foreign participants are involved in programmes.

Given the benefits that are derivable from the reported ban, state and local governments should emulate the steps of the Federal Government. There is hardly any doubt that they will find the cost management strategy helpful in freeing some funds for more important projects and the overall profile of their finances especially in cognisance of their subsisting inability to pay the emoluments of civil servants in many states.

In order to realise the intended policy objectives, government will need to embark on a number of things. First is to remove from the 2016 budget items that have to do with souvenirs in the areas that have been banned. In future, such items should have no budget lines and that will remove a ready source of temptation for government officials. The second is to block any other area that may be used by officials to, in any guise, procure banned souvenirs. Third, to secure the commitment of civil servants, they must be properly briefed on funds and policy compliance management.

The establishment of a fool-proof technology-based compliance monitoring and reporting system is a necessity. Finally, in view of the tedious route in implementing sanctions in the civil service, government should find expeditious ways of implementing sanctions that will deter officials from attempting to sabotage this new commendable directive.


In this article:
Muhammadu BuhariSouvenirs
Receive News Alerts on Whatsapp: +2348136370421

4 Comments
  • Mike Johnson

    Do you know farming is one of the ways out of the current economic recession? What are you waiting for? Join hundreds of Nigerians, undergraduates, young and old graduates in our class of pig farmers and improve your fortune by making over N5MILLION within 9 months. The buyers are many, but the sellers CAN’T meet their increasing daily demands. You can start small and grow big. SMS “PIGFARMING” to 33811 for more info. Don’t be a late comer! SMS costs N50 only.

    • amador kester

      Cash crop farming for export is also a cash cow eg cashew nuts,sesame seeds,mango,onions,tomatoes,etc even charcoal. Nigerians exported five billion naira worth of cashew nuts last year before europe banned our beans etc dur to the reckless use of toxic pesticides in nigeria and the silence of the agric and health ministries

  • EyeServis

    In a sane country, items such as “banned” souvenirs handed out at government-organised conferences is one avenue state financial resources are used to fund local economies and therefore create employment. The idea being that such (sub) contracts, usually awarded to very small businesses make use of local labour and (raw) materials which is then paid for as goods and services by the organiser (government department or agency).

    It would therefore be too narrow-minded to the point of being counter-productive if the only view taken by government is that such contracts constitute a “waste of resources”.

    We need people in government with a bit of worldly commonsensical view and who are capable of thinking outside the (Nigerian) terribly claustrophobic box please.

  • Anne Mumuney

    Thank god!! is this the end of these ridiculous adult party packs?? Pardon me for not understanding the culture, but I cannot fathom the rationale for attending an event, and leaving with a huge load of rubbish that must have cost a fortune, and that you are never going to actually use. People fight over them, are offended if they don’t receive one more plastic tray or mug. Don’t we have something better to do with our money?? It is just ridiculous. Almost as ridiculous as buying our own currency on the road, like it was plaintain chips.. Mr. CBN Governor, I see you have not been able to tackle this problem. And it is a problem you know. It is utter disrespect for our money, which translates to disrespect for the country. Do something to teach respect for our currency please.