Saturday, 15th March 2025
To guardian.ng
Search

Trump’s presidency: Between new global order and more adversity

By Editorial Board
10 February 2025   |   5:47 am
H.G. Wells in 1901 said: “If the universe is non-ethical by our present standards, we must reconsider those standards and reconsider our ethics.” Wells’ proposition implies that common humanitarianism must be the starting point as people learn to live with multiple perceptions
US President Donald Trump signs an executive order in the Oval Office of the WHite House in Washington, DC, on January 20, 2025. (Photo by Jim WATSON / POOL / AFP)

H.G. Wells in 1901 said: “If the universe is non-ethical by our present standards, we must reconsider those standards and reconsider our ethics.” Wells’ proposition implies that common humanitarianism must be the starting point as people learn to live with multiple perceptions of truth in the pursuit of human progress. Common humanity demands that whatever detracts from human well-being must be questioned, regardless of its effects on economic growth, political power, or the stability of certain orders. Man’s first responsibility to his children is to ensure they have a future by avoiding catastrophic policies that could jeopardise their well-being.

  
As President Donald Trump returns to the prestigious and powerful office of the White House for the second time, the logical questions arise: What will Trump’s second term look like? What does it hold for global politics? Should Trump restore the fundamental principles embedded in the words of the Declaration of American Independence (1776)—the bedrock of American democratic tradition? Amid increasing terrorism, armed conflicts, bombings, wars, and humanitarian crises ravaging different parts of the world—especially the Russia-Ukraine war and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, both of which threaten international peace—what common values should Trump embrace to help build a new global order where justice, service, peace, respect for human dignity, the intrinsic worth of the human person, and mutual understanding reign?
  
Closer to home, how will Africa, particularly Nigeria, fare under Trump’s second presidency? Considering that the United States wields substantial influence worldwide, President Trump should seek to foster a new international order where justice, service, peace, and respect for human dignity take precedence. He should champion an ethic of human solidarity that advances human flourishing and protects the weak.
  
Understandably, both in his first term and now in his second term, President Trump has focused on “making America great again.” No fair-minded person should begrudge him that. However, while striving to make America great again, he must ensure that his actions do not jeopardise the opportunities available to other nations to pursue growth, stability, and order. The world has a collective responsibility to safeguard the future of children and descendants, ensuring they have the chance to live fully and push forward the frontiers of knowledge and culture for the benefit of humankind.
  
Shortly after his inauguration—which was graced by foreign dignitaries, members of the diplomatic corps, the crème de la crème of the global elite, and powerful world leaders such as President Javier Milei of Argentina, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, and China’s Vice President Han Zheng (representing President Xi Jinping)—tech moguls like Elon Musk, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos and his fiancée Lauren Sánchez, and Mark Zuckerberg were also in attendance. However, curiously, no African leader was present at the inauguration. It remains unclear whether they were not invited or whether they were invited and declined the invitation.
  
In keeping with his campaign promises, President Trump wasted no time in rolling out a flurry of executive orders, which included: the mass deportation of illegal immigrants in the United States, reinstating service members dismissed for refusing the COVID-19 vaccine, declaring a national emergency at the U.S.-Mexico border, withdrawing the U.S. from the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the Paris Climate Agreement, halting federal Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programmes, restricting federal recognition to two sexes: male and female, prohibiting transgender women from participating in women’s sports, reinstating the Mexico City Policy, which halts federal funding for abortion services, declaring a national energy emergency and reinstating the “Remain in Mexico” policy.
   
In executing these executive orders, the Trump administration should be mindful of its policies’ positive and negative impacts. First, these executive orders should adhere to constitutional principles, legal frameworks, and the rule of law. They should avoid executive overreach. Any order that contradicts laws passed by the U.S. Congress or violates constitutional rights will likely be blocked or overturned by the courts. These policies must not infringe on personal liberty, dignity, or privacy, as enshrined in the American Constitution.
  
President Trump’s mass deportation order is currently mired in controversy. Many immigrants living in the United States allege that they are facing threats and intimidation. Fear now dominates their daily lives, forcing many into hiding to avoid arrest and deportation. Granted, the United States has the right to deport criminals and undocumented immigrants from its territory. Former President Obama deported thousands of illegal immigrants, and former President Biden did the same.  Approximately, 1.4 million illegal immigrants, who were slated for deportation during the Biden administration, remain in the U.S. for reasons that are not entirely clear. Thus, the deportation of illegal immigrants is legally justified under U.S. law.
 
However, such deportations should be handled lawfully, fairly, and humanely. How Trump’s deportation order is being enforced has raised ethical and legal concerns. Brazil and Colombia, in particular, have expressed outrage over the treatment of their deported citizens, many of whom were shackled and handcuffed during deportation. Colombian President Gustavo Petro has openly criticised Trump for the alleged mistreatment of Colombian migrants. In response, Trump threatened tariffs on Colombian goods, escalating tensions between the two nations. However, the Trump administration backtracked on its threats after the Colombian government accepted certain conditions for the deportation. While the United States is justified in deporting criminals and undocumented immigrants, such actions should be carried out with dignity and respect for human rights.
 
African immigrants in the United States have also voiced their distress over Trump’s deportation policies. Mauritania tops the list with 3,822 deportees, followed by Nigeria with 3,690 deportees. At the time of this editorial, many undocumented Nigerians in the U.S. were reportedly living in perpetual fear of deportation. Many had stopped going to work, church, shopping malls, or other public places for fear of being arrested and deported. In protest, Nigerians in Philadelphia boycotted their jobs a few days ago. Meanwhile, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Removal Operations indicate that approximately 3,690 undocumented Nigerians face imminent deportation from the United States.
  
The Trump administration should give its deportation policy a humane face. All are members of the same human family, and no one should be treated as a slave. Trump’s deportation orders should be carried out within the purview of the law. They should not be used to settle old scores, nor should they serve as a weapon of oppression or dictatorship. Deportation efforts should prioritise individuals involved in serious crimes rather than those contributing positively to American society. Special care should be given to children, asylum seekers, and individuals who may face persecution or danger in their home countries. Detainees should be treated with dignity and not subjected to inhumane detention conditions. Additionally, deportation policies should consider the impact on families, especially children who may be U.S. citizens.

However, beyond Trump’s hardened deportation policies targeting Nigerians and other Africans in the United States, these deportations should serve as a wake-up call for African leaders to address the poor governance, economic hardship, insecurity, and lack of job opportunities that force their citizens to flee their home countries in search of so-called greener pastures abroad. Instead of indulging in official corruption and amassing material wealth, African leaders should focus on job creation, quality education, and infrastructure development to reduce mass migration.
To be continued tomorrow.

In this article

0 Comments