Experts harp on good corporate governance as organisations lose $1 trillion yearly to espionage
The need for organisations to take good corporate governance seriously to prevent espionage has been emphasized.
This comes as experts that corporate espionage had risen to an epidemic level leading to yearly organisational loss of about $1 trillion to espionages due to bad corporate governance.
They argued that corporate espionage and non-disclosures could be in the form of threat to trade secret, threat of technology, research materials, or information that a company could be blackmailed with and customer databases, among others.
At the Investigations, Compliance and Ethics (ICE) September series by Udo Udoma and Bello-Osagie Law Chambers, corporate governance practitioner and founder, David Olatunji Leadership Academy (DOLA), David Olatunji, said most organisations face bad corporate governance as a result of unethical issues.
Olatunji spoke on the theme: “The Biggest Ethical Issues Facing Businesses: The Role of Governance.”
He said good governance is at the very heart of every success in business, as it was no longer a strategy or culture but the minimum requirement for sustainability, especially when talking about the future of the business.
In today’s business environment, Olatunji said shareholders and stakeholders were all clamouring for good governance with high expectations that companies should be run in accordance with best practices globally.
In building a culture of ethics in organisations, he said there must be stakeholders’ approach to corporate governance, and the issue of good corporate citizenship.
He noted that the likeliest threat of espionage comes from within the organisation, adding that it could come from disgruntled employees giving away or selling trade secrets, sensitive information being overheard at a convention or trade show, an employee leaving to work for a competitor and bringing information with them and cyber spying.
He said threats of espionage could also come from illicit activities like theft of trade secrets, bribery, blackmail, technology surveillance and sabotage of a corporation.
He advised organisations about releasing sensitive information especially in their annual reports, noting that it would be used against them as industry espionage.
He linked the usual targets of industrial espionage to trade secret and unprotected information about existing clients’ information.
Speaking on how to detect and prevent corporate espionage, Olatunji said: “Every organisation needs to conduct a security audit of their premises, identify areas where organisations are vulnerable to hackers, like those cleaners, IT students, and those who just came to offer manual services.
“Organisations should review the processes they have for new employees to know what information they share with them, restrict them to certain data since they are still new, and train employees all the time.
“Organisations should maintain a clean desk policy, able to identify sensitive information and conduct risk assessment all the time.”
He maintained that ignorance in some organisations made them vulnerable to unethical issues, and urged them to have code of ethics for the board, and employees’ ethics where corporate espionage is going to be expressly stated.
He added that code of ethics should start from the board, as some large boards do not have code of ethics, “and very unfortunate because for the last 50 years, the major crash of various boards is unethical actions of the board members.”
Similarly, another expert on corporate governance, Sam Cookey Jr, looked at the evolving nature of corporate governance to change some paradigm as a positive tool.
He said most countries are moving from legalistic approach to principle-base and societal responsible approach to governance.