Former Bayelsa State Governor and Senator representing Bayelsa West, Seriake Dickson, has warned former governors against interfering in the affairs of their successors.

He declared that ex-leaders who continue to wield influence after leaving office undermine governance and democratic stability.
 
Speaking while addressing questions on the death of the state’s Deputy Governor, and the process of appointing a replacement, Dickson said former governors must resist the temptation to rule by proxy and allow sitting governors the freedom to govern.
 
According to him, the constitutional responsibility for appointing a deputy governor lies exclusively with the incumbent governor and should not be influenced by former officeholders, regardless of their role in installing the administration.
 
“The responsibility of appointing a deputy governor rests solely with the governor,” Dickson said.

“I brought the governor and his late deputy together, and they worked well. But six years into office, with only two years remaining, it is not in my place to interfere or impose a name.”
 
He said he had deliberately distanced himself from all succession discussions, directing aspirants to engage directly with the governor rather than seek his endorsement or intervention.
 
“I have made it clear that anyone interested in the position should approach the governor, not me,” he said.

“My role as a former governor is limited to offering advice when requested and supporting the government from a distance.”
 
Dickson argued that his hands-off approach since leaving office has helped preserve peace and political stability in Bayelsa, contrasting it with the crises witnessed in states where former governors openly clash with their successors.
 
“When I left office, I left without strings attached. I imposed no conditions,” he said. “That decision has helped maintain peace and stability in Bayelsa. I deliberately give the governor space to govern, and I have no intention of changing that.”
 
Warning against post-tenure interference, Dickson said leadership must have a clear beginning and a definite end, stressing that power retained beyond office weakens institutions and fuels instability.