Saturday, 9th November 2024
To guardian.ng
Search

‘Violent, peaceful protests rooted in leadership failure’

By Geoff Iyatse, Magaliesburg, South Africa
07 October 2024   |   3:39 am
Though the widespread peaceful and violent protests that erupted in Nigeria in the past few years may require different management approaches, both are rooted in the recent leadership failure, a Nigerian-British scholar in leadership, peace and conflict, Prof. ‘Funmi Olonisakin, has asserted.

• Military force can’t resolve either, scholar warns FG
• Envoy urges Africa to ditch colonial national borders 

Though the widespread peaceful and violent protests that erupted in Nigeria in the past few years may require different management approaches, both are rooted in the recent leadership failure, a Nigerian-British scholar in leadership, peace and conflict, Prof. ‘Funmi Olonisakin, has asserted.
   
The expert stated this during an interview with The Guardian on the sidelines of the ongoing inaugural Annual Peace and Security Dialogue (APSD), hosted by the Thabo Mbeki Foundation (TBF) in Magaliesburg, Gauteng Province, South Africa.
 
Addressing the enduring crises, which range from Boko Haram terrorism to banditry and street protests, she argued, would require a paradigm shift in approach to leadership and fixing social challenges that created economic exclusion.
 
The Vice President/Vice Principal of King’s College London warned that extreme violent attacks that heightened security concerns in the country could not be addressed with “only military solutions”, as such tactics had not been effective anywhere in the world, where citizens took up arms against the state.

  
“Then, the complexity in the case of Boko Haram is that it has aligned itself with international terrorist organisations. This has complicated the issue,” she noted.
 
The addition of youth protest and banditry, among others, she noted, adding that the force was the only solution to problems that require “fundamental transformation in our leadership framework and infrastructure”.
  
According to her, the infrastructure should be seen as only the hardware element of leadership, which should be part of a coordinated system of approach that should include economic rehabilitation.
 
“The software is what we never pay attention to. That includes the relationship between the leaders and the society,” she pointed out, adding that leadership included the economy, politics and social infrastructure.
 

The scholar argued that “every leadership decision has consequences” for the economy, welfare, future growth and the public good; hence, political leaders could not continue to give excuses for everything.
  
In her presentation at the dialogue, Olonisakin demanded a pragmatic switch to Africa-led solutions to African problems and insisted that the inherited liberal peace formula had been adopted by the continent without thorough interrogation.
 
The need to embrace the African approach resonated across all speeches by scholars and politicians with questions also raised on how Africa could balance political and economic interests.

 
Whereas many speakers called for indigenous approaches, Chief of Staff and Senior Political Advisor, African Union High-Level Implementation Panel for Sudan and South Sudan, Abdul Mohammed, noted the complication in adopting pan-Africanism as a political and economic solution to the challenges facing the continent.
  
The complexity, he argued, is underscored by the conflict of colonial and people’s borders. For her, while Africa adopted colonial borders as a matter of convenience after political liberation, the real borders are the people’s borders (referring to culturally relevant delineations), which have been jettisoned.
 
“African solutions to African problems has been used and misused in a manner that keeps its political context. This reflects in our captured institutions. One example is the border issue,” he said, citing how the border issue was resolved during the secession of South Sudan.  
 
The four-day dialogue, organised in partnership with the Institute for Global Dialogue (IGD), the Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), is in response to rising conflict and insecurity in the continent. It offers the participants an opportunity to chart a new path for a more peaceful continent and proffer solutions to historical existential crises.
 
With the theme, ‘Towards a Peaceful and Secure Africa: Challenges and Opportunities’, the conference aims to “provide a platform for critical thinking and generate practical solutions to peace and security challenges in Africa,” the organisers announced.
 

0 Comments