Sir: In the exacting annals of military history, the term “great captain” is reserved for a select few. It’s a title that transcends mere battlefield success, demanding a rare confluence of exceptional personal attributes and the opportune moment of historical necessity.
As the historian Richard A. Gabriel posits, a commander’s true measure is found when “challenging times provide opportunities for their unusual abilities to come to the fore.” By this stringent standard, Nigeria’s current Chief of Defence Staff (CDS), General Christopher Gwabin Musa, is forging a legacy that warrants his consideration among the nation’s, and arguably history’s most outstanding military leaders.
The first, and perhaps most defining, element is the historical circumstance in which General Musa operates. The contemporary security landscape of Nigeria is a crucible of crisis, unprecedented in its complexity and sheer scale. The nation is simultaneously grappling with a relentless Boko Haram/ISWAP insurgency in the North-East, pervasive banditry and kidnapping across the North-West, a resurgence of inter-communal and ethno-religious conflicts, and critical threats to resource infrastructure in the Niger Delta.
This multifaceted, multi-theatre threat matrix represents a fundamental challenge to the Nigerian state’s sovereignty and social fabric. It is a moment of profound national peril, demanding a leader capable of a radical, rather than incremental, overhaul of the nation’s defence architecture. The gravity of this crisis provides the ultimate historical stage, demanding the highest forms of strategic leadership and institutional transformation.
The response to this crisis, demonstrated by the CDS, confirms the presence of the second essential factor: the prerequisite traits of personality and character. Like figures such as Thutmose III, who was compelled to reform an Egyptian military system that had stagnated for millennia, General Musa has exhibited the rare combination of intellect and foresight. He has proven capable of a deep strategic comprehension—the ability to “comprehend his world as it is, even as he sees beyond it to the objectives he wishes to advance.”
This clarity of vision has been the driving force behind a wave of necessary, and often institutionally painful, reforms. Instead of clinging to worn-out, conventional doctrines designed for state-on-state warfare, the CDS has championed a fundamental shift in military thought and organisation.
His tenure has been marked by a vigorous prioritisation of joint operations, ensuring greater synergy between the Army, Navy, and Air Force—a crucial necessity for combating dispersed, asymmetric enemies.
Furthermore, he has emphasised the development of a professionalised officer corps deeply attuned to the dynamics of internal security, counter-insurgency, and the ethical conduct of warfare in civilian environments.
The commitment to institutional transformation is perhaps the most compelling evidence of General Musa’s potential historical standing. Addressing a crisis of this magnitude requires more than tactical victories; it demands a wholesale modernisation of the Armed Forces. This modernisation drive extends to radically upgrading the logistics base to support sustained, multi-theatre engagements across Nigeria’s challenging terrain, and the acquisition of new tools of war tailored for asymmetric, low-intensity conflicts.
These are not merely operational adjustments; they represent profound organisational and psychological shifts. By enforcing stricter discipline and demanding rapid adaptability on the asymmetric battlefield, General Musa is forcing the Nigerian military to evolve beyond its post-colonial inertia.
Such efforts echo the massive internal reforms that catapulted ancient powers onto the world stage, demonstrating a commitment not just to managing the current crisis but to building a future-proof defence establishment.
In conclusion, the confluence of a profound national security crisis and the decisive, intellectually clear, and institutionally reformative leadership of General Musa solidifies his standing. His command is characterised by the courage to confront deeply entrenched systemic issues, a clear strategic roadmap, and the moral authority necessary to implement change.
When the definitive history of this tumultuous era is finally penned, his tenure will be remembered not simply for managing an insurgency but for reinventing the Nigerian military and equipping it to face 21st-century threats. This act of military statesmanship, born in a crucible of crisis, secures for General Musa a definitive place among Nigeria’s most outstanding Generals and justifies his potential inclusion among the great captains of history.
Kennedy Elaigwu Awodi wrote from North Carolina, USA. He can be reached via: awodikenoutlook.com