AA moves to heal wounds, reconcile aggrieved members

Action Alliance (AA)

Following the decisive ruling of the Court of Appeal of Nigeria affirming its leadership, the Action Alliance (AA) has shifted focus to internal reconciliation, launching moves to mend divisions and reunite aggrieved members after months of factional disputes.

The appellate court sitting in Makurdi had upheld the legitimacy of the party’s National Convention held on February 22, 2025, effectively affirming the leadership of the Kenneth Udeze-led National Executive Committee. The judgment brought to a close a prolonged legal battle over the party’s leadership structure.

But rather than dwell on the victory, the party leadership says its immediate priority is to rebuild trust within its ranks.
Speaking in Abuja after the verdict, Udeze described the court’s decision as not just a legal triumph but an opportunity for healing.

“This judgment is not about winners and losers within the party. It is a victory for the rule of law and for the unity of Action Alliance. Now is the time to come together and move forward,” he said.

The leadership has begun reaching out to key stakeholders who were aligned with opposing factions during the crisis, including supporters of Manga Asha, whose suit had challenged the legitimacy of the convention.

Party insiders disclosed that a reconciliation committee is being considered, with a mandate to engage aggrieved members, address grievances, and recommend pathways for reintegration into the party’s mainstream structure.

Sources within the party also hinted at plans for a broader stakeholders’ meeting that would bring together leaders from across states to foster dialogue and chart a unified course ahead of the 2027 general elections.

Political observers say the reconciliation drive is critical for the party’s survival and relevance, especially as smaller political parties in Nigeria often struggle with internal cohesion after leadership disputes.

They note that with the court having provided clarity on leadership, the onus is now on the party to demonstrate political maturity by accommodating dissenting voices and preventing further fragmentation.

The ruling is also expected to guide the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) in its dealings with the party, particularly in recognising its leadership for official communications and electoral processes.

For many within the party, however, legal clarity alone may not be enough to restore unity.

“There are deep-seated grievances that need to be addressed beyond the courtroom,” a party chieftain said. “The leadership must show sincerity in reconciliation if the party is to move forward as one.”

Analysts argue that how the Udeze-led leadership manages this post-judgment phase could determine the party’s electoral prospects. A fragmented structure, they warn, could weaken its ability to mobilise effectively and present a credible alternative in future elections.

Still, there are signs of cautious optimism among party faithful that the worst may be over.

Udeze reiterated that his leadership would adopt an inclusive approach moving forward, assuring members that no one would be sidelined in the rebuilding process.

“We are extending a hand of fellowship to everyone. This party belongs to all of us, and together we will reposition it for greater impact,” he said.

As the dust settles on the legal battle, the Action Alliance now faces a different test—whether it can translate courtroom victory into political unity and renewed strength ahead of the 2027 polls.

Join Our Channels