Don’t enforce N60b fine on facebook, court orders ARCON
14 December 2024 |
2:25 am
Justice Yellim Bogoro of the Federal High Court, Lagos, has granted an interim order restraining the Advertising Regulatory Council of Nigeria (ARCON) from demanding N60 billion from Facebook Nigeria over alleged violation.
Justice Yellim Bogoro of the Federal High Court, Lagos, has granted an interim order restraining the Advertising Regulatory Council of Nigeria (ARCON) from demanding N60 billion from Facebook Nigeria over alleged violation.
The judge made the order on Friday in a suit marked FHC/L/CS/2205/2024, following a November 29, 2024, motion ex-parte filed by Facebook through its counsel, Mofesomo Tayo-Oyetibo (SAN).
Upon reading the affidavit in support of the motion ex parte sworn to by Folasade Dada, and after hearing Mr. Tayo-Oyetibo with Jessica Adeola-Ajayi, the court granted the application.
Justice Bogoro held: “I have considered the ex parte application, the reliefs sought particularly relief number two of the ex parte application, the affidavit in support, the facts deposed thereto in the affidavit. I find merit in the application. I shall grant the reliefs in part.
“It is hereby ordered as follows: That an Interim Order of Injunction is hereby made pending the determination of the motion on notice herein filed for interlocutory injunction restraining the defendant whether by itself or through its officers, agents, servants and any other person acting under its authority from enforcing or further enforcing in any manner whatsoever the notice of violation/demand for compliance dated October 21, 2024, issued by the defendant to the applicant. I strongly feel the second relief sought is subsumed in the first relief.
“That this suit is hereby adjourned to February 20, 2025, for hearing of motion on notice. Hearing notice should be served on the defendant.” Facebook had sought two reliefs. The first was “An interim order of injunction, pending the determination of the Motion on Notice for interlocutory injunction, restraining the defendant, whether by itself or through any person acting under its authority from enforcing or further enforcing in any manner whatsoever the Notice of Violation/Demand for Compliance dated October 21, 2024, issued by the defendant to the applicant.”
The second relief sought is “An interim order of injunction restraining ARCON, whether by itself or through its prosecutors or anyone acting under its authority from instituting or commencing criminal proceedings in the Advertising Offences Tribunal to prosecute the applicant, its officers, agents or representatives, with respect to the allegations and/or decisions made by the Defendant and/or subject matter of the Notice of Violation/Demand for Compliance dated 21st October 2024 issued by the Defendant to the Applicant.”
In seeking the reliefs, the applicant filed 11 grounds for the application. It stated that ARCON issued it a Notice of Violation/Demand for Compliance dated October 21, 2024, making certain allegations and decisions against Facebook, including imposing the N6 billion fine.
It challenged the constitutionality of the ARCON Notice based on grounds of denial of fair hearing, its unlawfulness under the Advertising Regulatory Council of Nigeria Act 2022 (ARCON Act) and as an ultra vires act of the defendant.
It continued: “The defendant threatened that it will enforce the ARCON Notice against the Applicant by criminal prosecution in the Advertising Offences Tribunal if the applicant does not satisfy its demands.
“The applicant issued a statutory pre-action notice demanding the Defendant to withdraw the threat of enforcement, yet the defendant has not done so.
“Order Viii Rule I of the Advertising Offences Tribunal Practice Direction mandates that a hearing in the Tribunal must be completed within 180 days of filing the charge.
“Section 306 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015, which applies in the Tribunal, prohibits the grant of an order for a stay of proceedings in a criminal matter.
“The defendant appoints the prosecutor in the Tribunal, while the Chairman and other members of the Tribunal were appointed on the recommendation of the Defendant.”
Facebook added that it would be vexatious and oppressive to the applicant and unconscionable for the defendant to initiate criminal proceedings against the applicant based on the allegations and decisions made by the defendant in the ARCON Notice, while the applicant’s suit challenging the constitutionality and legality of the ARCON Notice is pending in the court.
×
Get the latest news delivered straight to your inbox every day of the week. Stay informed with the Guardian’s leading coverage of Nigerian and world news, business, technology and sports.
0 Comments
We will review and take appropriate action.