Taraba youths rally support for CMD’s appointment at FUWTH

Southern Taraba Youths in collaboration with the Jukun Youths And Cultural Development Association, have written a counter-petition backing the appointment of Professor Ayuba as Chief Medical Director (CMD) of at the Federal University Wukari Teaching Hospital in Wukari local government council of Taraba state.

Noting that his appointment is gaining traction, they argued that Professor Ayuba’s appointment represents a commitment to quality healthcare and the selection of the most capable candidate, aligning with the mission of strengthening federal institutions through merit-based appointments.

The President Nafinji Danjuma Aboki and Secretary General Awudu Kefas, in a joint statement on Thursday, emphasised that his experience as a medical consultant, academic, and practitioner makes him an exceptional choice to lead the institution. 

They also contend that regional affiliations should not overshadow qualifications, especially in roles critical to public health, like that of the CMD. Limiting such appointments by locality, they argue, could undermine the pursuit of excellence within the healthcare system.

“This appointment, made by Health Minister, Ali Pate, highlights the federal government’s dedication to meritocracy in healthcare leadership,” they stated.

“His selection by the Ministry reflects a commitment to advancing healthcare for all citizens, regardless of regional distinctions.”

The group argued that prioritizing highly qualified candidates in federal roles is essential to achieving national healthcare objectives, and said Ayuba’s credentials, “will enable him to bring significant advancements to the teaching hospital.”

According to them, “the Federal University Wukari Teaching Hospital, as a national institution, should prioritize Nigeria’s healthcare goals over local concerns.”

Some groups have earlier frowned at the appointment because the CMD came 4th in the interview that led to his appointment.

Describing the CMD’s selection as “injustice”, the aggrieved groups said, “this decision disregards the principles of meritocracy, fairness, and regional equity. It reflects poorly on a federal institution that ought to uphold transparency and prioritize qualified candidates, especially when the position involves important responsibilities in healthcare leadership.”