Get Guardian on Google
ARTIFICIAL intelligence is transforming education worldwide, but in Nigeria, the gap between technological promise and classroom reality has never been wider. This document explores the tensions, opportunities, and hard truths shaping the future of AI in Nigerian education.
Nigeria faces a paradox that few nations confront: the world is racing toward AI-powered education while millions of Nigerian children have never stepped inside a functioning classroom. The numbers are staggering, and they demand more than technological optimism. Nigeria holds the world’s highest number of out-of-school children, a crisis deepened by poverty, insecurity, and infrastructure gaps. Many schools lack consistent electricity, internet connectivity, or even functional furniture, prerequisites for any AI deployment, and in public classrooms, a single teacher may manage 55 or more students, making personalised instruction nearly impossible.
In 2024, a World Bank-supported intervention in Edo State offered a rare glimpse of what AI-powered learning could look like when it is done the right way. The results were remarkable and instructive. Students showed performance gains of 0.3 standard deviations, equivalent to two years of traditional classroom progress achieved in just six weeks. This proves that AI can accelerate learning dramatically, but only when the ecosystem around it is intentionally designed to support it.
The Founder/CEO of Next Generation Global Associates, Ilouno Basil Michael, in his opinions, stated that before any AI tool can reach a Nigerian student, it must overcome a wall of infrastructural deficits that policymakers rarely address head-on. Broadband, electricity, and affordability are not secondary concerns, they are the foundation. National broadband coverage remains below 50 per cent, with rural access significantly lower. In many communities, reliable internet is a luxury, not a utility, AI-heavy tools consume significant data. For households choosing between food, transport, and mobile data, educational AI becomes an unaffordable choice, and without consistent power, even the most advanced AI applications are irrelevant. Schools in northern and rural states face daily outages that make digital learning impossible.
In August 2024, the Federal Ministry of Education launched a draft National AI Strategy focusing on sector-wide adoption. The document acknowledges education as a priority area and signals political will at the highest levels. The strategy represents a meaningful first step, but drafts do not educate children, Implementation does. Without bridging the gap between strategy and implementation, Nigeria’s AI education policy risks remaining a document on a shelf rather than a transformation in classrooms. AI was promised as a great equaliser. Instead, without deliberate policy, it is becoming a new axis of inequality, widening the gap between those who have access and those who do not.
Well-resourced institutions deploy AI tutors, adaptive learning platforms, and international curriculum tools. Students gain competitive advantages that compound over time. Public schools in northern and rural states lack electricity, let alone AI tools. The same technology meant to democratise education deepens existing inequalities.
Western-trained AI models struggle with Nigerian Pidgin, Hausa, Yoruba, and Igbo. Students speaking local dialects are effectively excluded from AI-powered tools.
Technology does not exist in a vacuum. The teachers who stand at the front of Nigerian classrooms every day are not obstacles to AI adoption — they are its most critical stakeholders. Many teachers worry that AI will make them invisible or replaceable — a concern not without merit given how some EdTech platforms are marketed. This anxiety, left unaddressed, becomes resistance. UNESCO-supported initiatives like the Naija Teacher AI programme aim to train 1.5 million educators to use AI as an assistant, not a replacement. The evidence is clear: AI succeeds when teachers are part of the design phase, not just the deployment phase.
EdTech platforms are expanding rapidly across Nigerian schools, but a troubling reality emerges: regulatory frameworks have not kept pace, leaving student data, privacy, and academic integrity at very high risk. Student biometrics data are been collected without secure, enforceable frameworks.
Parents and schools often have no visibility into what is collected or how it is used. Existing laws are broad and fail to address AI-specific risks like academic dishonesty. My opinion is that Nigerian schools must not become a testing ground for foreign software. I strongly believe there is an urgent need for the government to ensure that policies on AI tools are adapted to Nigerian context, language and values.
Scaling AI in Nigerian education requires a fundamental shift, away from flashy donor-driven pilots and toward unglamorous, systemic investment in the infrastructure, tools, and people that make learning possible. Our government must co-design with Nigerian educators. The most important principle is to design tools with Nigerian teachers and students, not for them.
The classroom must not be forced to fit the software, rather the software must fit the classroom AI is not a magic solution for Nigeria’s education crisis. But it remains one of the most powerful tools available for the future — if deployed with honesty, equity, and deep respect for the realities of Nigerian classrooms. The question is not whether AI belongs in Nigerian classrooms — it is whether Nigeria’s classrooms will be ready to meet AI on their own terms.
Michael, MD and founder/CEO of Next Generation Global Associate, wrote from Ikeja.
