Nigeria has spent the past three years doing something its policymakers could no longer postpone. Fuel subsidies were removed, the foreign exchange market was overhauled, monetary policy was tightened and efforts were made to rebuild public revenues and external reserves.

The reforms have produced results at the macroeconomic level, but there is another side to the story, and it is the one Nigerians experience every day.

For millions of households, economic stability has not yet translated into an easier life.

The IMF itself acknowledged this in its June 2026 assessment, saying that conditions remained difficult for many Nigerians. It estimated that poverty had reached 63 per cent at the national poverty line and that 27 million Nigerians faced food insecurity in the second half of 2025. The World Bank has similarly noted that household incomes have yet to fully recover and that poverty remains high.

This raises an uncomfortable question: if an economy is becoming more stable, when does that stability begin to improve the economic freedom of the people living in it?

The question matters because economic reform is ultimately not about making statistics look healthier. It is about creating an economy in which people have enough room to make choices about their lives.

A worker earning a salary should be able to afford transportation to work, feed a family, pay rent and still have something left to save or invest. A young person should be able to start a small business without spending most of the available capital on power, transport, rent and regulatory costs. A trader should be able to restock without watching the value of working capital disappear under rising prices.
That is where the gap between macroeconomic stability and everyday economic reality becomes difficult to ignore.

Nigeria’s inflation rate has fallen considerably from its 2024 levels, but lower inflation does not mean that prices have returned to where they were. It simply means that prices are rising more slowly. The distinction is important for a household whose income has already been severely eroded.

The same is true of fuel. The removal of the petrol subsidy was one of the most consequential reforms of the past three years. It also immediately changed the cost structure of the economy. Transport fares rose, businesses faced higher logistics costs and those costs filtered into the prices of food and other goods.

Now, in September 2026, petrol prices have risen again amid higher global oil prices. It was reported that petrol was selling at about N1,400 per litre in Lagos and Abuja, with prices reaching N1,500 in some parts of northern Nigeria, while diesel had moved above N2,000. The result is another round of pressure on households and businesses.

For someone earning the national minimum wage of N70,000, these are not abstract economic developments. They are daily decisions about what can be postponed, what can be bought and what has to be sacrificed.

If transport takes a larger share of income, food consumes more of the household budget and rent continues to rise, the nominal increase in wages does not necessarily translate into greater economic freedom.
The same pressure is being felt by small businesses.

For an SME, higher energy, transport, rent, taxes and input costs can quickly turn revenue growth into an illusion. A business may be selling more and still be making less. It may have customers and still struggle to maintain working capital. It may have a viable idea and still be unable to obtain affordable credit.

Nigeria has created several intervention programmes over the years to address financing gaps, but the continuing difficulty many smaller businesses face in obtaining affordable long-term credit raises a broader question about the financial system itself.

If a small manufacturer has to borrow at rates that make productive investment difficult, or an entrepreneur cannot obtain financing without substantial collateral, how much freedom does that entrepreneur really have to expand?
This does not mean that the reforms were unnecessary. A country cannot sustainably build prosperity on distorted fuel prices, an unstable foreign exchange regime, weak public finances or monetary imbalances.

Nigeria needed to address those problems. But stabilisation is a means, not the destination.
The real test is whether the foundations created by the reforms eventually allow Nigerians to live, work, save, invest and build with less pressure than before.

A worker needs more than a nominal wage increase. He needs an income whose purchasing power gives him some room to plan.
A family needs more than lower inflation on paper. It needs to feel that its income is no longer being swallowed by the basic cost of surviving.

This is why the next phase of Nigeria’s reforms should focus increasingly on how macroeconomic gains are transmitted to households and productive businesses.

The challenge, then, is not to abandon reform. It is to complete the journey from stabilisation to prosperity.

Nigeria cannot afford an economy in which the government can point to stronger reserves, higher revenues and improved macroeconomic indicators while households remain trapped in a daily struggle to afford food, transport and housing.

Stabilisation is only the first part of the promise of reform. The harder part is turning that stability into purchasing power, opportunity and greater room for Nigerians to make choices about their own lives.
Until that happens on a broad scale, the question will remain: Nigeria may be stabilising its economy, but has it really freed the economy for the people?
—————————————————
Abigail Ikhaghu is a Journalism for Liberty Fellow at the Liberalist Centre.