Get Guardian on GoogleBy Dr. Abiola Salami
PARTICIPATION IS NOT THE SAME AS PROGRESSION
World Bank Gender Data, drawing on ILO modelled estimates, puts Nigeria’s female labour-force participation at 80.7 per cent in 2025, compared with 84.3 per cent for men. Yet participation does not automatically translate into quality employment, decision-making authority or senior leadership.
McKinsey’s 2025 Women in the Workplace analysis covering Nigeria, India and Kenya reported that women held approximately 51 per cent of entry-level roles in Nigeria but around 38 per cent of senior-level positions. It also noted barriers to entering formal employment and a relatively narrow pipeline into the C-suite.
If women are participating in the workforce, what happens as they seek to progress?
One data point cannot explain the entire Nigerian labour market; industries, organisational structures and career pathways differ. But the evidence reinforces the need to examine progression, not simply participation. An organisation may employ many women while its strategic assignments, revenue-generating responsibilities, succession opportunities and most influential positions remain concentrated elsewhere. It may be counting women’s presence without assessing their influence.
THE INVISIBLE STRUCTURES THAT SHAPE PROGRESSION
Career progression is rarely determined by competence alone. It is shaped by access to opportunities, sponsorship, networks, culture, performance evaluation, flexibility, leadership expectations and workplace relationships. Some barriers are formal and visible. Others are embedded in everyday behaviour.
Consider strategic assignments. Who leads a major transformation programme? Who is entrusted with a difficult business unit? Who gains exposure to the board, is sponsored for an international opportunity, or is considered ready for promotion? These decisions shape careers long before a vacancy is advertised.
How leadership potential is interpreted also matters. Organisations sometimes judge readiness through narrow expectations of availability, visibility, personal style or conformity to established leadership behaviour. Left unexamined, these expectations cause capable professionals to be overlooked because they do not fit an inherited image of leadership.
Culture matters too. Employees may formally have equal opportunities while informal behaviours undermine them. Being interrupted, excluded from influential networks, denied credit or expected to prove competence repeatedly can accumulate into significant professional disadvantage. The effect may not appear in any policy document, but it becomes visible in career trajectories.
THE COST OF UNDERUTILISED CAPACITY
When capable women cannot progress, organisations risk losing institutional knowledge, leadership potential, innovation and the return on their investment in recruitment and development. When women leave because they see limited prospects, the organisation incurs replacement costs and loses experience. When they stay but are excluded from meaningful responsibility, it retains talent without fully benefiting from it. And when leadership pipelines are unnecessarily narrow, succession options weaken.
The cost is not always visible in financial statements. It shows up in lower engagement, reduced retention, missed opportunities, weaker decision-making and a leadership bench that does not reflect the organisation’s available talent. The question is not only whether organisations employ enough women, but whether they are getting the best from the women they employ.
THE RESPONSIBILITY OF LEADERSHIP
This cannot be delegated to human resources or diversity committees. It is a leadership responsibility. Chief executives set priorities. Boards shape governance expectations and succession oversight. Line managers shape daily employee experience. Senior leaders decide who receives sponsorship, visibility and consequential assignments.
WHY MEASUREMENT MATTERS
Organisations cannot improve what they have not examined. This is one reason for the No More Shrinking® Full Capacity Report. It moves beyond general statements about women’s empowerment to investigate the workplace experiences, progression conditions and organisational practices that shape women’s capacity; where women encounter barriers, how structures influence advancement, and which leadership behaviours enable or constrain contribution.
The report does not begin from a predetermined conclusion that every organisation discriminates against women, or that every difference in career outcome has a single explanation. Its aim is to investigate, listen, examine evidence and identify patterns organisations can act on.
A credible report must be willing to discover complexity, recognising differences across sectors, career stages, organisational sizes and professional contexts, and distinguishing individual experiences from systemic patterns. Most importantly, it must provide a basis for practical action.
Visit www.tppafrica.com for the full article
About Dr. Abiola Salami
Dr. Abiola Salami is a World-Class Performance Strategist, leadership authority and founder of CHAMP Global Leadership Consulting. He is the originator of Performance Leadership™ and the driving force behind No More Shrinking®, platforms dedicated to advancing leadership excellence, human potential and transformative impact. Through his work, he equips leaders and organisations to bridge the gap between investment, capability, execution and measurable outcomes, building the leadership capacity required to achieve extraordinary and sustainable performance. Reach him on [email protected]
