Nnamdi Kanu’s long road to freedom revisited
![](https://guardian.ng/wp-content/plugins/ventra-lazy-load/images/1x1.trans.gif)
Sir: Nnamdi Kanu’s incarceration has taken a new turn with the Supreme Court’s recent reinstatement of terrorism charges against him. This development has dashed hopes for Kanu’s swift release, leaving his supporters with a long and uncertain wait.
Kanu’s prolonged detention by the Nigerian government has sparked intense debate. While many believe his release would bring peace to the violence-ravaged south-east region, others are skeptical. Releasing Kanu isn’t straightforward, and one must consider the complexities involved.
Kanu’s decision to travel to Kenya, leaving his safe haven in Europe, was a critical mistake. This move ultimately led to his arrest and detention. Similarly, Sam Ekpa, a close associate, is facing challenges in Finland due to Nigerian authorities.
For Kanu to be released, he must renounce his separatist ideology and retract his statements about Nigeria. Historical parallels, such as the case of Ojukwu, demonstrate that dialogue and negotiation can resolve such issues. However, Kanu’s circumstances differ, and his supporters may view compromise as betrayal.
Releasing Kanu without abandoning his separatist agenda poses significant risks. Even within the Igbo leadership, freedom without renouncing separatism is unacceptable. Kanu’s path to freedom appears protracted and uncertain, requiring careful consideration of competing interests and priorities.
Ultimately, Kanu’s freedom may depend on his willingness to abandon his agitation. While being in prison may dampen his zeal, pressure from IPOB members, especially those in the diaspora, may intimidate him into continuing his fight.
My appeal to Nnamdi is to learn from King Rehoboam’s mistake. Rehoboam rejected the wise counsel of elderly advisors, while embracing the counsel of the young men who grew up with him. Similarly, Nnamdi should be cautious of those around him, including barristers, who may be driven by self-interest rather than his well-being. They may be fueling the conflict to maintain their relevance, as they would lose their purpose if Nnamdi were to abandon his IPOB stance. Nnamdi, remember that discretion is often the better part of valor. Consider embracing peace when President Tinubu offers it, rather than prolonging your detention unnecessarily.
• Sly Edaghese Milwaukee, Wi, [email protected]
![](https://guardian.ng/wp-content/themes/guardian2021/img/newsletter_icon.png)
Get the latest news delivered straight to your inbox every day of the week. Stay informed with the Guardian’s leading coverage of Nigerian and world news, business, technology and sports.
0 Comments
We will review and take appropriate action.